Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703418›Full record

SynthesisPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2022

Analgesia for retinopathy of prematurity screening: A systematic review.

Arun J Thirunavukarasu, Refaat Hassan, Shalom V Savant, Duncan L Hamilton

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06889376 (The Use of Intranasal Sedation With Midazolam to Reduce Stress, Discomfort and Procedural Pain in Preterm Newborns and Infants During Routine ROP Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06889376 phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Intranasal Sedation With Midazolam to Reduce Stress, Discomfort and Procedural Pain in Preterm Newborns and Infants During Routine ROP Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorPolish Mother Memorial Hospital Research InstituteRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDrug SafetyArmsIntranasal midazolam administration via the DART™ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Evidence-based guideline for neonatal pain management in China (2023)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Analgesia for retinopathy of prematurity screening: A systematic review.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Procedural pain management in neonates: A Narrative review.International journal of critical illness and injury science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arun J ThirunavukarasuSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-4768
Refaat HassanSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Shalom V SavantSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8464-5708
Duncan L HamiltonJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2132-4867
University of Cambridge · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPremature neonates require regular ophthalmological examination, generally indirect ophthalmoscopy, to screen for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Conventional analgesia is provided with topical anesthetic eyedrops and oral sugar solution, but neonates still experience significant pain. Here, the literature base was examined to evaluate the usefulness of other pharmacological analgesics. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review was undertaken, adhering to a PROSPERO preregistered protocol in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (identifier CRD42022302459). Electronic databases were searched for primary research articles on pharmacological pain interventions used for ROP screening in neonates. The primary outcome measure was pain scores recorded using validated pain scoring tools, with and without pharmacological interventions in neonates during eye examination. For analysis, studies were separated into two categories: topical anesthesia and alternative pharmacological treatments.

resultsEleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Topical analgesia, oral paracetamol, and intranasal fentanyl were found to be effective in reducing the pain of eye examination. Oral morphine and inhaled nitrous oxide had no significant effect on premature infant pain profile (PIPP) scores during indirect ophthalmoscopy. DISCUSSION: In addition to topical anesthesia, premedication with oral paracetamol is recommended during screening examination for ROP. The routine use of fentanyl is not recommended due to the risk of potential side effects. Non-pharmacological measures, such as sweet oral solutions and comfort techniques should also be employed. Further research is required to determine whether the use of nitrous oxide has a role, and to develop a safe and effective analgesic strategy to fully ameliorate the pain of ROP screening.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaRetinopathy of PrematurityAcetaminophenFentanylHumansInfant, NewbornNitrous OxidePainPain MeasurementAcetaminophenFentanylNitrous Oxideanalgesiceye examinationindirect ophthalmoscopyneonatalnitrous oxideopioidsparacetamolretinopathy of prematurityscreening toolstopical anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID35703418
PMCPMC9543288
OpenAlexW4282961944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.