Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703391›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Molecular mechanisms of acquired antifungal drug resistance in principal fungal pathogens and EUCAST guidance for their laboratory detection and clinical implications.

Thomas R Rogers, Paul E Verweij, Mariana Castanheira, Eric Dannaoui, P Lewis White, Maiken Cavling Arendrup, Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Diagnostic criteria for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in COPD patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Repositioning Antimicrobial Peptides Against WHO-Priority Fungi.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Refractory versus resistant invasive aspergillosis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Activity of Rezafungin Against Echinocandin Non-wild typeOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Susceptibility patterns ofInfection prevention in practice · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Thomas R RogersDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-7729
Paul E VerweijDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8600-9860
Mariana CastanheiraJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0126-1782
Eric DannaouiUnité de parasitologie-mycologie, service de microbiologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France.
P Lewis WhitePublic Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, UHW, Cardiff, UK.
Maiken Cavling ArendrupUnit of Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4747-0144
Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)
Statens Serum Institut · DKUniversité Paris Cité · FRPublic Health Wales · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLJMI Laboratories · USTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing incidence and changing epidemiology of invasive fungal infections continue to present many challenges to their effective management. The repertoire of antifungal drugs available for treatment is still limited although there are new antifungals on the horizon. Successful treatment of invasive mycoses is dependent on a mix of pathogen-, host- and antifungal drug-related factors. Laboratories need to be adept at detection of fungal pathogens in clinical samples in order to effectively guide treatment by identifying isolates with acquired drug resistance. While there are international guidelines on how to conduct in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing, these are not performed as widely as for bacterial pathogens. Furthermore, fungi generally are recovered in cultures more slowly than bacteria, and often cannot be cultured in the laboratory. Therefore, non-culture-based methods, including molecular tests, to detect fungi in clinical specimens are increasingly important in patient management and are becoming more reliable as technology improves. Molecular methods can also be used for detection of target gene mutations or other mechanisms that predict antifungal drug resistance. This review addresses acquired antifungal drug resistance in the principal human fungal pathogens and describes known resistance mechanisms and what in-house and commercial tools are available for their detection. It is emphasized that this approach should be complementary to culture-based susceptibility testing, given the range of mutations, resistance mechanisms and target genes that may be present in clinical isolates, but may not be included in current molecular assays.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsInvasive Fungal InfectionsDrug Resistance, FungalFungiHumansLaboratoriesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID35703391
PMCPMC9333407
OpenAlexW4282963864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.