ArticleMedical physics2022
Accelerated cardiac T1 mapping with recurrent networks and cyclic, model-based loss.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory navigator-guided multi-slice free-breathing cardiac TPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Free-breathing 3D cardiac extracellular volume (ECV) mapping using a linear tangent space alignment (LTSA) model.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Accelerated Cartesian cardiac T2 mapping based on a calibrationless locally low-rank tensor constraint.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Arterial Input Function (AIF) Correction Using AIF Plus Tissue Inputs with a Bi-LSTM Network.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- The influence of left bundle branch block on myocardial T1 mapping.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Scanner-Independent MyoMapNet for Accelerated Cardiac MRI TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Article
- Present and Future Innovations in AI and Cardiac MRI.Radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUsing the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) as a biomarker, the myocardium can be quantitatively characterized using cardiac T1 mapping. The modified Look-Locker inversion (MOLLI) recovery sequences have become the standard clinical method for cardiac T1 mapping. However, the MOLLI sequences require an 11-heartbeat breath-hold that can be difficult for subjects, particularly during exercise or pharmacologically induced stress. Although shorter cardiac T1 mapping sequences have been proposed, these methods suffer from reduced precision. As such, there is an unmet need for accelerated cardiac T1 mapping. PURPOSE: To accelerate cardiac T1 mapping MOLLI sequences by using neural networks to estimate T1 maps using a reduced number of T1-weighted images and their corresponding inversion times. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 911 pre-contrast T1 mapping datasets from 202 subjects (128 males, 56 ± 15 years; 74 females, 54 ± 17 years) and 574 T1 mapping post-contrast datasets from 193 subjects (122 males, 57 ± 15 years; 71 females, 54 ± 17 years) were acquired using the MOLLI-5(3)3 sequence and the MOLLI-4(1)3(1)2 sequence, respectively. All acquisition protocols used similar scan parameters:
resultsOur proposed network demonstrated similar T1 estimations to the standard MOLLI sequences (pre-contrast:
conclusionsA bidirectional multilayered LSTM network with fully connected output and cyclic model-based loss was used to generate high-quality pre- and post-contrast T1 maps using the first three T1-weighted images and their corresponding inversion times. This work demonstrates that combining deep learning with cardiac T1 mapping can potentially accelerate standard MOLLI sequences from 11 to 3 heartbeats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.