Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703177›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2022

Circulating tumor DNA: current challenges for clinical utility.

Donna K Dang, Ben H Park

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exosomes in precision dermatology: From biomarkers to targeted therapeutics in personalized care.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donna K Dang
Ben H Park
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STACIE B DUSETZINA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TISSUE CoreP50CA098131 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO, PIETENPOL, JENNIFER A · 2003 to 2024
$48.7M
TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Tuya Pal, Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
Integrated Biological Systems Training in OncologyT32CA119925 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Vivian Gama, William Patrick Tansey · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Circulating plasma tumor DNA as a biomarker for early stage breast cancerR01CA194024 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Molecular complete response in blood as a predictor for pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancerR01CA214494 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO · 2018 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098131NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194024NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214494NCI NIH HHS T32 CA119925NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cells shed naked DNA molecules into the circulation. This circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become the predominant analyte for liquid biopsies to understand the mutational landscape of cancer. Coupled with next-generation sequencing, ctDNA can serve as an alternative substrate to tumor tissues for mutation detection and companion diagnostic purposes. In fact, recent advances in precision medicine have rapidly enabled the use of ctDNA to guide treatment decisions for predicting response and resistance to targeted therapies and immunotherapies. An advantage of using ctDNA over conventional tissue biopsies is the relatively noninvasive approach of obtaining peripheral blood, allowing for simple repeated and serial assessments. Most current clinical practice using ctDNA has endeavored to identify druggable and resistance mutations for guiding systemic therapy decisions, albeit mostly in metastatic disease. However, newer research is evaluating potential for ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease in the curative setting and as a useful screening tool to detect cancer in the general population. Here we review the history of ctDNA and liquid biopsies, technologies to detect ctDNA, and some of the current challenges and limitations in using ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease and as a general blood-based cancer screening tool. We also discuss the need to develop rigorous clinical studies to prove the clinical utility of ctDNA for future applications in oncology.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNABiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationNeoplasm, ResidualPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID35703177
PMCPMC9197509
OpenAlexW4282945615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.