Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703049›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Eye-movement replay supports episodic remembering.

Roger Johansson, Marcus Nyström, Richard Dewhurst, Mikael Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anticipatory eye gaze as a marker of memory.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A short natural history of mental time travels: a journey still travelled?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Eye-movement replay supports episodic remembering.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Looking for the neural basis of memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roger JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3434-2538
Marcus NyströmHumanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Richard DewhurstInteracting Minds Centre, Århus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mikael JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-6301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we bring to mind something we have seen before, our eyes spontaneously unfold in a sequential pattern strikingly similar to that made during the original encounter, even in the absence of supporting visual input. Oculomotor movements of the eye may then serve the opposite purpose of acquiring new visual information; they may serve as self-generated cues, pointing to stored memories. Over 50 years ago Donald Hebb, the forefather of cognitive neuroscience, posited that such a sequential

Indexed as

Eye MovementsMemory, EpisodicCuesMental Recallepisodic memoryeye movementsreinstatementreplayscanpaths

Identifiers

PMID35703049
PMCPMC9198773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.