Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702974›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Perceptions and behaviour of pregnant women in socioeconomic deprivation in rural areas. A qualitative study in France.

Aurélie Cabaillot, Marine Lavarenne, Julie Vaure Chiffre, Frédéric Tessieres, Mathilde Vicard Olagne, Catherine Laporte, Philippe Vorilhon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceptions and behaviour of pregnant women in socioeconomic deprivation in rural areas. A qualitative study in France.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aurélie CabaillotDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marine LavarenneDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Julie Vaure ChiffreDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frédéric TessieresDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Mathilde Vicard OlagneDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Catherine LaporteDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe VorilhonDépartement de médecine générale, UFR médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4418-4580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocioeconomic deprivation (SED) is a risk factor for complications during pregnancy and childbirth, the impact of which has been studied poorly in rural areas.

aimsTo explore the perceptions and behaviour of women living in SED in a rural area with regard to their pregnancy follow-up.

methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews was carried out in a rural area in central France. To participate, the women had to have an Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres deprivation score ≥ 30.17, be living in a rural area and have given birth during the month before the interview. The interviews were analysed using a thematic approach inspired by grounded theory.

resultsSeventeen women were interviewed. The difficulties of life in a rural area were linked to geographical remoteness, travel costs, lack of public services, inadequacy of nearby healthcare and social isolation. In all cases, pregnancy was an additional difficulty. The adaptive capability was related to the presence of an efficient family and social network. Most of the time, any increase in the limitations exceeded the ability to adapt and affected the medical follow-up of the pregnancy, although follow-up appointments were rarely abandoned altogether. Perceptions of birth preparation and parenting sessions were often limited to advice on pain management. Due to their affiliation with their rural area or their choice of lifestyle, the women complained only minimally.

conclusionWomen often minimize any limitations and implement adaptive techniques that make identification by social and medical services more difficult. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Eighteen women in SED were contacted by Childhood Medical Protection, midwives and general practitioners practising in rural areas. One woman declined participation and seventeen were interviewed.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareChildFemaleFranceHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSocioeconomic Factorspregnancyprenatal carequalitative researchrural areassemi-structured interviewssocioeconomic deprivation

Identifiers

PMID35702974
PMCPMC9615082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.