Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702867›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022

The importance of the generation interval in investigating dynamics and control of new SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Sang Woo Park, Benjamin M Bolker, Sebastian Funk, C Jessica E Metcalf, Joshua S Weitz, Bryan T Grenfell, Jonathan Dushoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Concepts and Methods for Predicting Viral Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Concepts and methods for predicting viral evolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Epidemic modeling with heterogeneity and social diffusion.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sang Woo ParkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2202-3361
Benjamin M BolkerDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-0443
Sebastian FunkDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2842-3406
C Jessica E MetcalfDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3166-7521
Joshua S WeitzSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3433-8312
Bryan T GrenfellDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jonathan DushoffDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-4794

Funding

Wellcome Trust 210758/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring the relative strength (i.e. the ratio of reproduction numbers) and relative speed (i.e. the difference between growth rates) of new SARS-CoV-2 variants is critical to predicting and controlling the course of the current pandemic. Analyses of new variants have primarily focused on characterizing changes in the proportion of new variants, implicitly or explicitly assuming that the relative speed remains fixed over the course of an invasion. We use a generation-interval-based framework to challenge this assumption and illustrate how relative strength and speed change over time under two idealized interventions: a constant-strength intervention like idealized vaccination or social distancing, which reduces transmission rates by a constant proportion, and a constant-speed intervention like idealized contact tracing, which isolates infected individuals at a constant rate. In general, constant-strength interventions change the relative speed of a new variant, while constant-speed interventions change its relative strength. Differences in the generation-interval distributions between variants can exaggerate these changes and modify the effectiveness of interventions. Finally, neglecting differences in generation-interval distributions can bias estimates of relative strength.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Contact TracingHumansPandemicsCOVID-19generation intervalreproduction numberSARS-CoV-2variants of concern

Identifiers

PMID35702867
PMCPMC9198506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.