ArticleBrain communications2022
Autologous cellular therapy for cerebral palsy: a randomized, crossover trial.
Article in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of cell therapy modalities and outcomes in cerebral palsy.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Regenerative medicine approaches for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of clinical safety and effectiveness.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Review
- Innovations in cell therapy in pediatric diseases: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Clinical results of neurorestorative cell therapies and therapeutic indications according to cellular bio-proprieties.Regenerative therapy · 2023Review
- Are We Getting It Right? A Scoping Review of Outcomes Reported in Cell Therapy Clinical Studies for Cerebral Palsy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We examined an autologous mononuclear-cell-therapy-based approach to treat cerebral palsy using autologous umbilical cord blood or bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells. The primary objective was to determine if autologous cells are safe to administer in children with cerebral palsy. The secondary objectives were to determine if there was improvement in motor function of patients 12 months after infusion using the Gross Motor Function Measure and to evaluate impact of treatment on corticospinal tract microstructure as determined by radial diffusivity measurement. This Phase 1/2a trial was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study in children aged 2-10 years of age with cerebral palsy enrolled between November 2013 and November 2016. Participants were randomized to 2:1 treatment:placebo. Treatment was either autologous bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells or autologous umbilical cord blood. All participants who enrolled and completed their baseline visit planned to return for follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after the baseline visit. At the 12-month post-treatment visit, participants who originally received the placebo received either bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cell or umbilical cord blood treatment. Twenty participants were included; 7 initially randomized to placebo, and 13 randomized to treatment. Five participants randomized to placebo received bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells, and 2 received umbilical cord blood at the 12-month visit. None of the participants experienced adverse events related to the stem cell infusion. Cell infusion at the doses used in our study did not dramatically alter motor function. We observed concordant bilateral changes in radial diffusivity in 10 of 15 cases where each corticospinal tract could be reconstructed in each hemisphere. In 60% of these cases (6/10), concordant decreases in bilateral corticospinal tract radial diffusivity occurred post-treatment. In addition, 100% of unilateral corticospinal tract cases (3/3) exhibited decreased corticospinal tract radial diffusivity post-treatment. In our discordant cases (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.