Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702686›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Outcomes from the Retrospective Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study on Lamellar Macular Hole Surgery.

Hanna Haave, Beáta Éva Petrovski, Michał Zając, Xhevat Lumi, Wassiliki Melekidou, Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk, Andrii Ruban, Ljubo Znaor, Jerzy Nawrocki, Zofia Anna Nawrocka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Hanna Haave *Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Beáta Éva Petrovski *Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8840-0169
Michał ZającOphthalmic Clinic "Jasne Blonia", Lodz, Poland.
Xhevat LumiEye Hospital, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-9865-4111
Wassiliki MelekidouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus Liebig University, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany.
Lyubomyr LytvynchukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus Liebig University, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6788-5312
Andrii RubanCenter of Clinical Ophthalmology, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ljubo ZnaorDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Jerzy NawrockiOphthalmic Clinic "Jasne Blonia", Lodz, Poland.
Zofia Anna Nawrocka *Ophthalmic Clinic "Jasne Blonia", Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8376-9218
Goran Petrovski *Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2905-9252
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity of Oslo · NOKyiv City Clinical Oncology Center · UALjubljana University Medical Centre · SIOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Split · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the functional and anatomical parameters of lamellar macular hole (LMH) surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling and determine which surgical technique provides the best visual outcome. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study on patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for LMH with or without combined phaco-vitrectomy, as well as gas-, air- or BSS-tamponade. Pre- and postoperative examination included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurements for functional comparison and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans to determine the contributing anatomical parameters. Results: A total of 66 consecutive patients were included (age: 71.79 ± 8.52 years), of which 47 (71.2%) were diagnosed as tractional type LMH, and 19 patients (28.8%) as degenerative type. An epiretinal membrane (ERM) was present in 63 of the patients (95.5%), LMH-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) was present in 19 patients (28.8%), and 16 patients (24.2%) had concomitant ERM and LHEP. In the group of tractional LMH, the mean central foveal thickness (CFT) was 81.1% thicker (P < 0.05) than in the degenerative group. Thirty-one patients (47.0%) underwent a combined phaco-vitrectomy procedure, while the rest underwent 23G, 25G or 27G PPV. Seventeen of the 66 patients received gas-tamponade (25.7%)-either SF Conclusion: PPV provided a high success rate and functional improvement for treating LMH for both tractional and degenerative types, as well as combined phaco-vitrectomy treatment when cataract was present.

Indexed as

BCVAdegenerativelamellar macular holeOCTsurgical outcomestractional

Identifiers

PMID35702686
PMCPMC9188806
OpenAlexW4281694627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.