Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702676›Full record

ArticleCase reports in oncology

Treatment Response Monitoring Using a Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Test in an Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient: A Case Report.

Georges Azzi, Shifra Krinshpun, Antony Tin, Minu Maninder, Allyson Koyen Malashevich, Meenakshi Malhotra, Ruben Ruiz Vega, Paul R Billings, Angel Rodriguez, Alexey Aleshin

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georges AzziHoly Cross Health, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Shifra KrinshpunNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Antony TinNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Minu ManinderNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Allyson Koyen MalashevichNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Meenakshi MalhotraNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Ruben Ruiz VegaHoly Cross Health, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Paul R BillingsNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Angel RodriguezNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Alexey AleshinNatera, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
Natera (United States) · USHoly Cross Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly aggressive disease that is often refractory to surgery and multiple lines of therapy. Although the repertoire of FDA-approved treatments has expanded, there is an unmet need for biomarkers that can aid in appropriate selection and timing of therapy. We present a case of highly aggressive treatment-resistant TNBC that employed a comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-based assay to identify therapeutic targets, followed by longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing. For this, a tumor-naïve next-generation sequencing-based targeted panel was used to aid in therapy selection, along with longitudinal personalized and tumor-informed ctDNA testing to monitor tumor response to treatment. Longitudinal ctDNA testing using the tumor-informed assay detected post-surgical molecular residual disease, and rise in ctDNA levels during the surveillance period provided rationale for switching between four lines of therapy. Overall, the combined use of CGP assay with longitudinal ctDNA testing resulted in a potential prolonged survival in this highly aggressive case of TNBC.

Indexed as

BiomarkerCirculating tumor DNATriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID35702676
PMCPMC9149406
OpenAlexW4225328563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.