Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702665›Full record

ReviewNeural computing & applications2022

Bike sharing usage prediction with deep learning: a survey.

Weiwei Jiang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural computing & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weiwei JiangSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876 China.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-5047
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a representative of shared mobility, bike sharing has become a green and convenient way to travel in cities in recent years. Bike usage prediction becomes more important for supporting efficient operation and management in bike share systems as the basis of inventory management and bike rebalancing. The essential of usage prediction in bike sharing systems is to model the spatial interactions of nearby stations, the temporal dependence of demands, and the impacts of environmental and societal factors. Deep learning has shown a great advantage of making a precise prediction for bike sharing usage. Recurrent neural networks capture the temporal dependence with the memory cell and gate mechanisms. Convolutional neural networks and graph neural networks learn spatial interactions of nearby stations with local convolutional operations defined for the grid-format and graph-format inputs respectively. In this survey, the latest studies about bike sharing usage prediction with deep learning are reviewed, with a classification for the prediction problems and models. Different applications based on bike usage prediction are discussed, both within and beyond bike share systems. Some research directions are pointed out to encourage future research. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first comprehensive survey that focuses on bike sharing usage prediction with deep learning techniques.

Indexed as

Bike sharingBike usage predictionDeep learningNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID35702665
PMCPMC9185130
OpenAlexW4282047882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.