Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702629›Full record

ReviewObstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine2022

Vaccinations in pregnancy.

Alexandra Cairns, Jennifer Hogan, Lucy Mackillop

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maternal vaccination: A narrative review.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2022
    Review
  2. Serum markers of B-cell activation in pregnancy during late gestation, delivery, and the postpartum period.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra Cairns, Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Jennifer Hogan, Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Lucy Mackillop, Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinations are a cost-effective means of preventing disease. They may be recommended primarily for maternal benefit or for prevention of intrauterine fetal or early neonatal infection. Data from the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems relating to the COVID-19 pandemic showed that for all countries studied (the UK, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Italy), at least 80% of pregnant women admitted to critical care were unvaccinated. In the UK this figure was 98%. The MBRRACE-UK 2014 report, covering 2009-2012 during the H1N1 epidemic, demonstrated that one in eleven maternal mortalities were directly from influenza virus: more than half could have been prevented by the flu vaccine in pregnancy. Research is ongoing to develop additional vaccines for infections that cause detrimental effects to pregnant women and their infants. Theoretical concerns regarding adverse effects to the fetus and lack of efficacy have, in general, not been confirmed by clinical evidence. Nevertheless, live attenuated vaccines remain contraindicated due to risk of fetal infection. As with any clinical decision, advice on antenatal vaccination should be based on the balance of risks and benefits to mother and fetus. This article aims to guide such decisions by discussing the issues surrounding commonly used vaccines and presenting current UK guidelines.

Indexed as

attenuated vaccinesfetal immunitylive vaccinesmaternal vaccinationvaccination during pregnancyvaccine risks

Identifiers

PMID35702629
PMCPMC9181831
OpenAlexW4282979880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.