Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702625›Full record

ReviewJAMIA open2022

How can natural language processing help model informed drug development?: a review.

Roopal Bhatnagar, Sakshi Sardar, Maedeh Beheshti, Jagdeep T Podichetty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. In Silico Clinical Trials: Is It Possible?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Improving Psychiatry Services with Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roopal BhatnagarData Science, Data Collaboration Center, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Sakshi SardarQuantitative Medicine, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Maedeh BeheshtiQuantitative Medicine, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jagdeep T PodichettyQuantitative Medicine, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To summarize applications of natural language processing (NLP) in model informed drug development (MIDD) and identify potential areas of improvement. Materials and Methods: Publications found on PubMed and Google Scholar, websites and GitHub repositories for NLP libraries and models. Publications describing applications of NLP in MIDD were reviewed. The applications were stratified into 3 stages: drug discovery, clinical trials, and pharmacovigilance. Key NLP functionalities used for these applications were assessed. Programming libraries and open-source resources for the implementation of NLP functionalities in MIDD were identified. Results: NLP has been utilized to aid various processes in drug development lifecycle such as gene-disease mapping, biomarker discovery, patient-trial matching, adverse drug events detection, etc. These applications commonly use NLP functionalities of named entity recognition, word embeddings, entity resolution, assertion status detection, relation extraction, and topic modeling. The current state-of-the-art for implementing these functionalities in MIDD applications are transformer models that utilize transfer learning for enhanced performance. Various libraries in python, R, and Java like huggingface, sparkNLP, and KoRpus as well as open-source platforms such as DisGeNet, DeepEnroll, and Transmol have enabled convenient implementation of NLP models to MIDD applications. Discussion: Challenges such as reproducibility, explainability, fairness, limited data, limited language-support, and security need to be overcome to ensure wider adoption of NLP in MIDD landscape. There are opportunities to improve the performance of existing models and expand the use of NLP in newer areas of MIDD. Conclusions: This review provides an overview of the potential and pitfalls of current NLP approaches in MIDD.

Indexed as

deep learningdrug developmentmachine learningNLP

Identifiers

PMID35702625
PMCPMC9188322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.