Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702588›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Physician perceptions and use of reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants for extended phase venous thromboembolism treatment.

Danielle Groat, Karlyn A Martin, Rachel P Rosovsky, Kristen M Sanfilippo, Manila Gaddh, Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, M Elaine Eyster, Scott C Woller, Venous thromboEmbolism Network US (VENUS) VTE Treatment, Anticoagulation Management Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle GroatCenter for Humanizing Critical Care Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-4448
Karlyn A MartinDivision of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-8705
Rachel P RosovskyDivision of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-7365
Kristen M SanfilippoDivision of Hematology Department of Medicine Washington University School of Medicine St Louis Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-7845
Manila GaddhDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-9848
Lisa Baumann KreuzigerBlood Research Institute Versiti Milwaukee Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-0548
M Elaine EysterPenn State Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania USA.
Scott C WollerDepartment of Medicine Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2522-2705
Venous thromboEmbolism Network US (VENUS) VTE Treatment, Anticoagulation Management Group
Emory University · USHarvard University · USIntermountain Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USVersiti Blood Center of Wisconsin · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban and rivaroxaban, have been studied for extended-phase treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Yet, scant evidence exists surrounding clinician practice and decision-making regarding dose reduction. Aims: Report clinician practice and characteristics surrounding dose reduction of DOACs for extended-phase VTE treatment. Methods: We conducted a 16-question REDCap survey between July 14, 2021, and September 13, 2021, among ISTH 2021 Congress attendees and on Twitter. We explored factors associated with dose reduction using logistic regression. We used k-means clustering to identify distinct groups of dose-reduction decision-making. Random forest analysis explored demographics with respect to identified groups. Results: Among 171 respondents, most were attending academic physicians from North America. Clinicians who treated larger volumes of patients had higher odds of dose reduction. We identified five clusters that showed distinct patterns of behavior regarding dose reduction. Cluster 1 rarely dose reduces and likely prescribes rivaroxaban over apixaban; cluster 2 dose reduces frequently, does not consider age when dose-reducing, is least likely to temporarily reescalate dosing, and prescribes apixaban and rivaroxaban equally; cluster 3 dose reduces <50% of the time, and temporarily reescalates dosing during increased VTE risk; cluster 4 dose reduces frequently, temporarily reescalates dosing, and is most likely to prescribe apixaban over rivaroxaban; and cluster 5 dose reduces most frequently, and takes the fewest risk factors into consideration when deciding to dose reduce. Conclusions: Most clinicians elect to dose-reduce DOACs for extended-phase anticoagulation. The likelihood of a clinician to dose reduce increases with volume of patients treated. Clinician prescribing patterns cluster around VTE risk factors as well as reescalation during high-risk periods.

Indexed as

anticoagulantapixabanreduced‐doserivaroxabantreatmentvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35702588
PMCPMC9175245
OpenAlexW4282028762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.