ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Operative Planning of Chest Wall Reconstructions Illustrated by a Large Defect in a Child.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary en-bloc resection and concurrent chest wall reconstruction for a massive rib Ewing sarcoma in a child: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Pectoralis Major and Abdominis Rectus Musculocutaneous Flap Reconstruction for Sternal Wound Closure in Ectopia Cordis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Chest wall osteochondroma resection with biologic acellular bovine dermal mesh reconstruction in pediatric hereditary multiple exostoses: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of large chest wall defects is challenging. Here we discuss the process of decision-making in planning chest wall reconstruction, considering the requirements of tumor removal, stabilization of the chest wall, and soft tissue coverage, illustrated by a case of a hemi-chest wall defect in a child. Ewing sarcoma measuring 10 × 9 × 13 cm was resected in a 9-year-old boy, followed by stabilization using a Gore-Tex patch. Due to extension of the oncologic resection far into the superomedial quadrant of the chest, tension-free coverage with a classical latissimus-dorsi flap could not be achieved. Integrating the serratus-anterior muscle into the flap creating a chimeric latissimus-dorsi/serratus-anterior flap allowed for excellent soft tissue coverage of the foreign body. As the skin could be preserved, careful incision planning was necessary to allow for best possible exposure during oncologic resection and flap harvest, while ensuring skin vascularization impaired by underlying tumor resection. Two vertical skin incisions were chosen, one presternal and a second in the mid-axillary fold delineating a large bipedicled skin flap. Postoperative recovery was excellent. Solid skin vascularization and adequate soft tissue coverage of the alloplastic material allowed for the patient to receive two cycles of postoperative radiotherapy without developing wound dehiscence. Careful interdisciplinary planning of skin incisions allowed for good exposure for tumor resection and flap harvest while preserving skin vascularization. Choosing a chimeric latissimus-dorsi/serratus-anterior flap provided larger coverage than a classical latissimus-dorsi flap with minimal additional donor site morbidity. Taken together, we here present a pragmatic solution to a complex problem.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.