ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Practical Review of the Cost of Diagnosis and Management of Positional Plagiocephaly.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microstructure of white matter fiber tracts in infants with positional plagiocephaly.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors for cranial deformities in infancy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Observational
- Diagnostic and treatment possibilities in the management of positional plagiocephaly.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of goal attainment for helmet therapy versus conservative management for positional plagiocephaly in infants.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
- Are we all seeing the same thing? Discrepancies between parent-reported and physician-reported positional plagiocephaly severity scores.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of Sonographic Parameters on the Effects of Cranial Molding Helmet Therapy in Infants with Positional Plagiocephaly.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Current understanding of children's head shape and its impact on health: a cross-sectional study among pediatric medical staff in China.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- The Caregiver Burden of Helmet Therapy following Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.Pediatric neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Smartphone Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Plagiocephaly Diagnosis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positional plagiocephaly has garnered increased research interest since the introduction of the Back to Sleep campaign in the 1990s, and the subsequent increase in infants with cranial deformity. Research has focused on treatment outcomes and developing new modalities to address asymmetric heads. Little attention has been given to the cost of treatment and diagnosis. This study aimed to summarize the literature and provide an overview of the costs associated with a diagnosis of positional plagiocephaly. Methods: A literature review was performed by searching PubMed and Ovid Embase to identify studies pertaining to the "cost" of plagiocephaly diagnosis or treatment through direct financial factors, disturbance to daily routines (ie, through treatment prolongation), or related stress. Results: Twenty-nine peer-reviewed studies were included. Treatment options for plagiocephaly are stratified by severity and age of diagnosis, with different pathways available to treat different stages of asymmetry. The common factor across all treatment modalities is that earlier diagnosis unequivocally leads to better aesthetic outcomes and shorter treatment times. This leads to lower costs for treatment, a lower stress burden for parents, and lower costs for the healthcare system in the future through reduction of long-term effects. Our theoretical cost model suggests that early diagnosis at 4 months can lead to a treatment cost of $1495, when compared with $5195 for detection of deformity at or after 6 months. Conclusion: The dramatic cost disparity between early and late diagnosis highlights the need for reliable methods to accurately detect cranial deformity early in an infant's life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.