Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702496›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Quality of Life Effects of an Oral Fixed Combination of Netupitant and Palonosetron in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prevention: Real-World Evidence in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline-Cyclophosphamide-Based Chemotherapy.

Jörg Schilling, Christian M Kurbacher, Claus Hanusch, Steffi Busch, Martin Holländer, Janine Kreiss-Sender, Daniela Rezek, Elisa Flahaut, Meinolf Karthaus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jörg SchillingGynecological Oncology Practice, Berlin, Germany.
Christian M KurbacherGynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.
Claus HanuschDepartment of Gynecology, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Steffi BuschGynecological Practice, Mühlhausen, Germany.
Martin HolländerGynecological Practice, Pirmasens, Germany.
Janine Kreiss-SenderGynecological Oncology Practice, Braunschweig, Germany.
Daniela RezekBreast Cancer Center Hamburg at Marien-Hospital Wesel, Wesel, Germany.
Elisa FlahautDepartment of Medical Affairs, RIEMSER Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Meinolf KarthausDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Neuperlach, Munich, Germany.
Marien Hospital Wesel · DEMünchen Klinik Harlaching · DERiemser Pharma (Germany) · DERotkreuzklinikum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In a prospective non-interventional study involving 2,173 patients, we showed that use of the oral fixed combination of netupitant 300 mg and palonosetron 0.5 mg (NEPA) for prevention of chemotherapy (Ctx)-induced nausea and vomiting has beneficial effects on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with various types of cancers receiving highly or moderately emetogenic Ctx. Here, we report on the effects on QoL, effectiveness, and tolerability of NEPA in patients with breast cancer exposed to anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based Ctx. Methods: This is a post hoc subanalysis of a prospective non-interventional study in 1,197 patients with breast cancer receiving up to 3 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide and NEPA. NEPA administration was per the summary of product characteristics. Results: In cycle 1 of Ctx, a large proportion of patients (84%) reported "no impact on daily life" (NIDL) due to vomiting; 53% of patients reported NIDL due to nausea. The complete response rate was 86/88/81% in the acute/delayed/overall phase in cycle 1, and NEPA was well tolerated throughout the study. Conclusion: The real-world beneficial effects of NEPA prophylaxis on QoL were confirmed for patients with breast cancer receiving AC. NEPA was effective with a good safety profile in this patient population in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AntiemeticBreast cancerChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingNEPANetupitantPalonosetronReal-world

Identifiers

PMID35702496
PMCPMC9149467
OpenAlexW3165551620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.