Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702494›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Malignancy Rate and Malignancy Risk Assessment in Different Lesions of Uncertain Malignant Potential in the Breast (B3 Lesions): An Analysis of 192 Cases from a Single Institution.

Svjetlana Mohrmann, Anna Maier-Bode, Frederic Dietzel, Petra Reinecke, Natalia Krawczyk, Thomas Kaleta, Ulrike Kreimer, Gerald Antoch, Tanja N Fehm, Katrin Sabine Roth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Svjetlana MohrmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anna Maier-BodeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Frederic DietzelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Petra ReineckeInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Natalia KrawczykDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thomas KaletaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ulrike KreimerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gerald AntochDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tanja N FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Katrin Sabine RothDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The question of how to deal with B3 lesions is of emerging interest. Methods: In the breast diagnostics of 192 patients between 2009 and 2016, a minimally invasive biopsy revealed a B3 lesion with subsequent resection. This study investigates the malignancy rate of different B3 subgroups and the risk factors that play a role in obtaining a malignant finding. Results: The distribution of B3 lesions after minimally invasive biopsy was as follows: atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 7.3%; flat epithelial atypia (FEA), 7.8%; lobular neoplasia (LN), 7.8%; papilloma (Pa), 49.5%; phylloidal tumour (PT), 8.9%; radial sclerosing scar (RS), 3.1%; mixed findings, 10.4%; and other B3 lesions, 5.2%. Most B3 lesions were detected by stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (44.3%), 36.5% by ultrasound-assisted biopsy, and 19.3% by magnetic resonance imaging-assisted biopsy. Most B3 lesions (55.2%) were verified by surgical resection, whereas 30.7% were downgraded to a benign lesion. About 14.1% of the cases were upgraded to malignant lesions, 9.4% to ductal carcinoma in situ and 4.7% to invasive carcinoma. In relation to individual B3 lesions, the following malignancy rates were found: 28.6% (ADH), 13.3% (FEA), 33.3% (LN), 12.6% (Pa), 5.9% (PT), and 0% (RS). The most important risk factor was increasing age. Postmenopausal status was considered an increased risk for an upgrade ( Conclusion: Increasing knowledge about B3 lesions allows us to develop a "lesion-specific" therapy approach in the heterogeneous group of B3 lesions, with follow-up imaging for some lesions with less malignant potential and concordance with imaging or further surgical resection in cases of disconcordance with imaging or higher malignant potential.

Indexed as

B3 lesionBreast surgeryMalignancy rateRisk factorsTherapy

Identifiers

PMID35702494
PMCPMC9149469
OpenAlexW3212601612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.