ArticleCureus2022
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Agreement of Perfusion Indexes Measured on Different Fingers by a Portable Pulse Oximeter in Healthy Adults.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A physiotherapy protocol* for stroke patients in acute hospital settings: expert consensus from the Brazilian early stroke rehabilitation task force.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Guideline
- A New Proposed Approach to Categorize Sepsis Sub-phenotypes Based on Combined Trajectories of Perfusion Index and Central Venous Oxygen Saturation.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Regional tissue perfusion index (RTPI): a new optical-based metric for quantifying regional tissue perfusion.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Effect of contralateral limb exercise on peripheral perfusion index in a resting limb.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Article
- Factors affecting the measurements of peripheral oxygen saturation values in healthy young adults.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Perfusion Index ratio and End-Diastolic Velocity ratio in evaluating the efficacy of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Peripheral perfusion index of pulse oximetry in adult patients: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Prediction of preload dependency using phenylephrine-induced peripheral perfusion index during general anaesthesia: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pulse oximeters measure oxygen saturation, heart rate, and perfusion index (PI) by analyzing photoplethysmographic signals. PI is an indirect measure of peripheral perfusion expressed as a percentage of pulsatile signals to non-pulsatile signals. PI measured from different sites may show variation. PI may vary when measured on different fingers. In this study, we aimed to observe the variation of PI among different fingers of both hands. Methodology This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using a convenience sample recruited from a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. PI was measured in apparently healthy adults in a sitting posture after a five-minute rest. The pulse oximeter probe was attached to each finger and readings were taken after one minute. The analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to compare and find agreement among PI. Results Data from a total of 391 (229 [58.57%] male and 162 [41.43%] female) adult research participants with a mean age of 34.88 ± 10.65 years were analyzed. The PI was the highest on the middle finger in both hands. There was a significant difference among the PI measured on different fingers, F (9, 3900) = 15.49, p <0.0001. The ICC was 0.474, 0.368, and 0.635 for overall, right-hand, and left-hand fingers, respectively, which indicate poor (ICC < 0.5) to moderate (ICC = 0.5-0.75) levels of reliability. Conclusions The PI measured using consumer-grade pulse oximeters on different fingers may provide different readings. The highest PI reading is found on the middle finger. Clinicians and primary care physicians should consider the differences in measured PI among different fingers and should use the readings with caution for any diagnostic purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.