Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702461›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Agreement of Perfusion Indexes Measured on Different Fingers by a Portable Pulse Oximeter in Healthy Adults.

Sharada M Swain, Manju Lata, Sandeep Kumar, Shaikat Mondal, Joshil K Behera, Himel Mondal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharada M SwainDepartment of Physiology, Hi-Tech Medical College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Manju LataDepartment of Physiology, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Sandeep KumarDepartment of Physiology, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Shaikat MondalDepartment of Physiology, Raiganj Government Medical College and Hospital, Raiganj, IND.
Joshil K BeheraDepartment of Physiology, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND.
Himel MondalDepartment of Physiology, Saheed Laxman Nayak Medical College and Hospital, Koraput, IND.
Raiganj University · INEmployees State Insurance Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research · INEmployees' State Insurance Model Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pulse oximeters measure oxygen saturation, heart rate, and perfusion index (PI) by analyzing photoplethysmographic signals. PI is an indirect measure of peripheral perfusion expressed as a percentage of pulsatile signals to non-pulsatile signals. PI measured from different sites may show variation. PI may vary when measured on different fingers. In this study, we aimed to observe the variation of PI among different fingers of both hands. Methodology This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using a convenience sample recruited from a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. PI was measured in apparently healthy adults in a sitting posture after a five-minute rest. The pulse oximeter probe was attached to each finger and readings were taken after one minute. The analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to compare and find agreement among PI. Results Data from a total of 391 (229 [58.57%] male and 162 [41.43%] female) adult research participants with a mean age of 34.88 ± 10.65 years were analyzed. The PI was the highest on the middle finger in both hands. There was a significant difference among the PI measured on different fingers, F (9, 3900) = 15.49, p <0.0001. The ICC was 0.474, 0.368, and 0.635 for overall, right-hand, and left-hand fingers, respectively, which indicate poor (ICC < 0.5) to moderate (ICC = 0.5-0.75) levels of reliability. Conclusions The PI measured using consumer-grade pulse oximeters on different fingers may provide different readings. The highest PI reading is found on the middle finger. Clinicians and primary care physicians should consider the differences in measured PI among different fingers and should use the readings with caution for any diagnostic purposes.

Indexed as

oximeteroximetryoxygen saturationperfusion indexphotoplethysmographyplethysmographyreliability

Identifiers

PMID35702461
PMCPMC9176686
OpenAlexW4229453114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.