Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702450›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Efficacy of Single Dose of Fosfomycin Versus a Five-Day Course of Ciprofloxacin in Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.

Muhammad Mujeeb Hassan, Moeena Malik, Rabia Saleem, Amna Saleem, Khurram Zohaib, Adnan Younas Malik, Maham Javaid

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cranberry juice potentiates sensitivity of uropathogenicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Mujeeb HassanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Moeena MalikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Rabia SaleemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Amna SaleemDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Islamic International Medical College (IIMCT) Pakistan Railway Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Khurram ZohaibDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Adnan Younas MalikDepartment of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Maham JavaidDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Allama Iqbal Medical College · PKRawalpindi Medical University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveTreatment has become more challenging due to an aging population, polypharmacy and high prevalence of comorbid illness, antimicrobial antibiotic allergy or sensitivity, an increase in the number of individuals with underlying immunological or structural abnormalities, as well as the frequency of multidrug-resistant infections. Many multidrug-resistant bacteria are still susceptible to nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin, two ancient medicines. Their high urine concentrations and low toxicity give them an advantage over newer medications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a single dose of fosfomycin versus a five-day course of ciprofloxacin in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Methodology and data collection procedure: This randomized control trial was conducted in the Department of Medicine, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. A total of 46 patients were enrolled. Patients were divided randomly into two groups by using the lottery method. In group A, patients were given a single 3 g dose of oral fosfomycin. In group B, patients were given oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg) daily for five days. Then patients were followed-up in the Outpatient Department (OPD) for 28 days. After 28 days, patients were evaluated for resolution of symptoms (as per operational definition). Patients in whom symptoms would not be resolved were managed as per standard protocol. All this information was recorded on proforma.

resultsThe average age of the patients in group A was 39.41±9.80 years while in group B that was 41.32±17.76 years. In both groups, 23 females were equally divided. The mean duration of symptoms in group A was 4.78±1.98 days while in group B was 4.95±1.29 days. The minimum duration of symptoms was three days and the maximum was 10 days. In group A, there were 15 (65.21%) patients with efficacy achieved, and among eight (34.78%) patients, efficacy was not achieved while in group B, there were 15 (65.21%) patients in which efficacy was achieved, and among eight (34.78%) patients, efficacy was not achieved. There was no significant association between efficacy and study groups as the p-value was not significant (p=0.87).  Conclusion: The conclusion of the study was that in the treatment of simple urinary infections, a single dose of fosfomycin had equal efficacy and tolerability as a five-day course of ciprofloxacin.

Indexed as

ciprofloxacinfosfomycinmultidrug-resistant bacteriarandomized controlled trialuncomplicated urinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID35702450
PMCPMC9177222
OpenAlexW4229371701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.