Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702419›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2022

Pharmacologic and Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury in Adults and Children.

Ajay X Thomas, James J Riviello, Daniel Davila-Williams, Sruthi P Thomas, Jennifer C Erklauer, David F Bauer, Jon A Cokley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biomaterials and cell-based therapy post spinal cord injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Time is spine: critical updates for the intensivist.Current opinion in critical care · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgical and Medical Management of Pediatric Spine Trauma.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury: A Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ajay X ThomasDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-3255
James J RivielloDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Daniel Davila-WilliamsDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Sruthi P ThomasDivision of Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Jennifer C ErklauerDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
David F BauerDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Jon A CokleyDivision of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: This review provides guidance for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) management through an analytical assessment of the most recent evidence on therapies available for treating SCI, including newer therapies under investigation. We present an approach to the SCI patient starting at presentation to acute rehabilitation and prognostication, with additional emphasis on the pediatric population when evidence is available. Recent Findings: Further studies since the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS) demonstrated a potential functional outcome benefit with ultra-early surgical intervention ≤ 8 h post-SCI. Subsequent analysis of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) II and NASCIS III trials have demonstrated potentially serious complications from intravenous methylprednisolone with limited benefit. Newer therapies actively being studied have demonstrated limited or no benefit in preclinical and clinical trials with insufficient evidence to support use in acute SCI treatment. Summary: Care for SCI patients requires a multi-disciplinary team. Immediate evaluation and management are focused on preventing additional injury and restoring perfusion to the affected cord. Rapid assessment and intervention involve focused neurological examination, targeted imaging, and surgical intervention when indicated. There are currently no evidence-based recommendations for pathomechanistically targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Autonomic dysreflexiaMAP managementRehabilitationSpinal cord injurySpinal shockSurgical management of vertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID35702419
PMCPMC9184374
OpenAlexW4281677660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.