Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702415›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2022

Addressing missed opportunities for cervical cancer screening in Nigeria: a nursing workforce approach.

Elvis Anyaehiechukwu Okolie, David Aluga, Seun Anjorin, Felicity Nneoma Ike, Ekene Moses Ani, Blessing Ifeoma Nwadike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elvis Anyaehiechukwu OkolieSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK.
David AlugaSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK.
Seun AnjorinWarwick Centre for Global Health, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Felicity Nneoma IkeDepartment of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar 540271, Nigeria.
Ekene Moses AniDepartment of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar 540271, Nigeria.
Blessing Ifeoma NwadikeDepartment of Microbiology, University of Ibadan 200284, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the commonest gynaecological cancer affecting women, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite the availability of evidence on multiple prevention pathways, including vaccination and screening, the cervical cancer burden continues to increase, especially in LMICs. This disease typifies health inequality as more than 85% of related morbidity and mortality occur among women of low socio-economic status residing in developing countries. In Nigeria, cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Sadly, Nigeria lacks a tailored cervical cancer control policy or population-based screening programme which is recommended. Consequently, existing screening services are opportunistic, sparsely distributed and have reached less than 9% of eligible Nigerian women. This article highlights the current status of cervical cancer screening in Nigeria, contextualises the role of female nurses and proffers novel approaches to address missed opportunities for screening by leveraging the nursing workforce.

Indexed as

early detection of cancerhealth personnelNigerianursesUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35702415
PMCPMC9116993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.