Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702339›Full record

ReviewAgronomy for sustainable development2022

A research agenda for scaling up agroecology in European countries.

Chantal Gascuel-Odoux, Françoise Lescourret, Benoit Dedieu, Cécile Detang-Dessendre, Philippe Faverdin, Laurent Hazard, Isabelle Litrico-Chiarelli, Sandrine Petit, Lionel Roques, Xavier Reboud and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Agronomy for sustainable development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Chantal Gascuel-OdouxInstitut Agro, UMR SAS, INRAE, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-6671
Françoise LescourretUR PSH, INRAE, 84000 Avignon, France.
Benoit DedieuACT, INRAE, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Cécile Detang-DessendreInstitut Agro, UMR CESAER, INRAE, 21000 Dijon, France.
Philippe FaverdinInstitut Agro, UMR PEGASE, INRAE, 35000 Rennes, France.
Laurent HazardINP-Toulouse, UMR AGIR, INRAE, 31000 Toulouse, France.
Isabelle Litrico-ChiarelliBAP, INRAE, 86600 Lusignan, France.
Sandrine PetitInstitut Agro, UMR Agroécologie, INRAE, 21000 Dijon, France.
Lionel RoquesUR BIOSP, INRAE, 84000 Avignon, France.
Xavier ReboudInstitut Agro, UMR Agroécologie, INRAE, 21000 Dijon, France.
Michele Tixier-BoichardAgroParisTech, UMR GABI, INRAE, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Hugo de VriesInstitut Agro, UMR IATE, INRAE, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Thierry CaquetCollège de direction, INRAE, 75238 Paris, France.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRAgroParisTech · FRCollège de France · FRIngénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes · FRInstitut National Polytechnique de Toulouse · FRUniversité d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A profound transformation of agricultural production methods has become unavoidable due to the increase in the world's population, and environmental and climatic challenges. Agroecology is now recognized as a challenging model for agricultural systems, promoting their diversification and adaptation to environmental and socio-economic contexts, with consequences for the entire agri-food system and the development of rural and urban areas. Through a prospective exercise performed at a large interdisciplinary institute, INRAE, a research agenda for agroecology was built that filled a gap through its ambition and interdisciplinarity. It concerned six topics. For genetics, there is a need to study genetic aspects of complex systems (e.g., mixtures of genotypes) and to develop breeding methods for them. For landscapes, challenges lie in effects of heterogeneity at multiple scales, in multifunctionality and in the design of agroecological landscapes. Agricultural equipment and digital technologies show high potential for monitoring dynamics of agroecosystems. For modeling, challenges include approaches to complexity, consideration of spatial and temporal dimensions and representation of the cascade from cropping practices to ecosystem services. The agroecological transition of farms calls for modeling and observational approaches as well as for creating new design methods. Integration of agroecology into food systems raises the issues of product specificity, consumer behavior and organization of markets, standards and public policies. In addition, transversal priorities were identified: (i) generating sets of biological data, through research and participatory mechanisms, that are appropriate for designing agroecological systems and (ii) collecting and using coherent sets of data to enable assessment of vulnerability, resilience and risk in order to evaluate the performance of agroecological systems and to contribute to scaling up. The main lessons learned from this collective exercise can be useful for the entire scientific community engaged in research into agroecology.

Indexed as

Agri-food systemsAgroecologyCollective prospectiveInterdisciplinarityResearch agendaTerritory

Identifiers

PMID35702339
PMCPMC9181893
OpenAlexW4285371540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.