ArticleJournal of public economics2021
Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the COVID-19 crisis.
Article in Journal of public economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compensate at your own risk: heterogeneity in compliance with preventive behaviors through the lens of economic and social preferences.International journal of health economics and management · 2026Article
- Not all areas are alike: willingness to comply with pandemic containment measures across residential contexts in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Role of Time Preferences in Compliance With COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors in Iran: A Quasi-hyperbolic Discounting Approach.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Article
- Impact of Dark Triad personality traits on COVID-19 vaccination uptake and prevention efforts: insights from the European Covid Survey (ECOS).BMC public health · 2025Article
- Risk, time preferences, trustworthiness and COVID-19 preventive behavior: evidence from France.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Article
- The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19.European economic review · 2023Article
- Lessons to Build an Educational Model for Higher Education Institutions Defined as Anchor Institutions to Tackle Public Health Crises: A Pilot Study on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Faculty and Students in Hebert L. College in the Bronx, NY.Journal of Hispanic higher education · 2023Article
- How does the vaccine approval procedure affect COVID-19 vaccination intentions?European economic review · 2023Article
- Socioeconomic and risk-related drivers of compliance with measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: evidence from the Munich-based KoCo19 study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Determinants of people's motivations to approach COVID-19 vaccination centers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- COVID-19 vaccination intentions and subsequent uptake: An analysis of the role of marginalisation in society using British longitudinal data.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2023Article
- Anti-social behaviour and economic decision-making: Panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19.Journal of economic behavior & organization · 2023Article
- Article
- Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 preventive and mitigation measures with mosque attendance in Pakistan.PloS one · 2023Article
- Does the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown affect risk attitudes?-Evidence from rural Thailand.PloS one · 2023Article
- Population preferences for non-pharmaceutical interventions to control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: trade-offs among public health, individual rights, and economics.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- Lockdown support, trust and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: Insights from the second national lockdown in France.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies.Economic modelling · 2022Article
- No-vaxxers are different in public good games.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyze in a survey study whether economic preferences and pre-crisis social responsibility predict social compliance to the policy regulations. Results show that economic preferences are closely related to compliance with policies fighting the crisis. Risk tolerance negatively affects citizens' avoidance of crowds, whereas patience helps to do so and to stay home. Present-biased subjects engage in panic buying. Risk tolerance is negatively related with the fear of COVID-19 and trust positively resonates with positive media perception. Pre-crisis social responsible behavior related to fare evasion, turnout, support of vaccination is also positively related with social compliance. Our findings offer insights, which may help policy-makers and organizations to identify risk groups and regions for the allocation of scarce medical or surveillance resources, such as vaccines, masks, and law enforcement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.