Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702294›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2022

Consumer acceptance and preference for brown rice-A mixed-method qualitative study from Nepal.

Pratiksha Gyawali, Dipesh Tamrakar, Abha Shrestha, Himal Shrestha, Sanju Karmacharya, Sanju Bhattarai, Niroj Bhandari, Vasanti Malik, Josiemer Mattei, Donna Spiegelman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Arsenic content and exposure in brown rice compared to white rice in the United States.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pratiksha GyawaliDepartment of Biochemistry Dhulikhel Hospital - Kathmandu University Hospital Dhulikhel Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5452-3155
Dipesh TamrakarDepartment of Community Medicine Dhulikhel Hospital - Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences Dhulikhel Nepal.
Abha ShresthaDepartment of Community Medicine Dhulikhel Hospital - Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences Dhulikhel Nepal.
Himal ShresthaDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology La Trobe University Bundoora Victoria Australia.
Sanju KarmacharyaDepartment of Nutrition Kathmandu University Hospital Dhulikhel Nepal.
Sanju BhattaraiDepartment of Community Programs Dhulikhel Hospital Dhulikhel Nepal.
Niroj BhandariKathmandu University School of Medical Sciences Dhulikhel Nepal.
Vasanti MalikDepartment of Nutritional Sciences University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Josiemer MatteiDepartment of Nutrition Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA.
Donna SpiegelmanDepartment of Biostatistics Yale School of Public Health New Haven Connecticut USA.
Archana ShresthaCenter of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science Yale School of Public Health New Haven Connecticut USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-090X

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brown rice consumption reduces the risk of diabetes. The prevalence of diabetes is increasing in Nepal; however, dietary preference remains for white rice. This study aimed to understand the perception, enablers, barriers, and facilitators of acceptance brown rice at a worksite cafeteria. Methods: We conducted a mixed-method qualitative research among 42 employees of a hospital in central Nepal. The participants tasted and rated the qualities of five different combinations of brown and white rice on a hedonic scale. We conducted eight focus group discussions (FGDs)-four before and four after tasting rice combinations. FGDs were recorded, transcribed, and coded verbatim and analyzed manually using inductive-deductive thematic method. Results: Before tasting, the participants perceived brown rice as poor in quality. After tasting, the participants found that brown rice had better quality and were willing to switch gradually starting with a 25B ratio. Eighty-three percent of participants liked a combination of 25B. Major barriers were poor perception of its quality, tradition, unavailability, lack of awareness of health benefits, and high price. Major facilitators were availability, self and family awareness about the health benefits, knowledge, the brown rice cooking process, serving with side dishes, prior tasting, and gradual substitution of brown rice. Conclusion: We found that brown rice should be promoted stepwise, first as a mixture with white rice and gradually increasing the proportion of brown rice. Brown rice acceptance can be increased by improved knowledge of its nutrition and health benefits, increasing availability, and affordability.

Indexed as

brown riceperceptionwhite Rice

Identifiers

PMID35702294
PMCPMC9179153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.