Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702226›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Comparing the efficacy of various methods for sulfate radical generation for antibiotics degradation in synthetic wastewater: degradation mechanism, kinetics study, and toxicity assessment.

Ali Behnami, Ehsan Aghayani, Khaled Zoroufchi Benis, Mohammad Sattari, Mojtaba Pourakbar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the Rate Constants ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali BehnamiDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences Maragheh Iran ppourakbar@yahoo.com +98 04132726363.
Ehsan AghayaniResearch Center for Environmental Contaminants (RCEC), Abadan University of Medical Sciences Abadan Iran.
Khaled Zoroufchi BenisDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Mohammad SattariDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Malayer University Malayer Iran.
Mojtaba PourakbarDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences Maragheh Iran ppourakbar@yahoo.com +98 04132726363.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8211-9640
University of Maragheh · IRMalayer University · IRUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study the aim was to investigate and compare various activation processes for amoxicillin degradation. UV radiation, ultrasound, heat, and hydrogen peroxide were selected as the persulfate activation methods. The effects of various parameters such as pH, persulfate concentration, reaction time, AMX concentration, radical scavengers, and anions were thoroughly investigated. The results showed that AMX degradation was following the pseudo-first order kinetic model. The reaction rate of 0.114 min

Identifiers

PMID35702226
PMCPMC9115878
OpenAlexW4282963319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.