Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702117›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022

Characteristics of bile microbiota in cholelithiasis, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, distal cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer.

Zhengqi Li, Jiangtao Chu, Feixiong Su, Xuan Ding, Yueming Zhang, Lizhou Dou, Yong Liu, Yan Ke, Xudong Liu, Yumeng Liu and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Microbial dysbiosis in cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhengqi LiDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Jiangtao ChuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Feixiong SuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Shenzhen 518116, China.
Xuan DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing, China.
Yueming ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Lizhou DouDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Yan KeDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Xudong LiuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Yumeng LiuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Guiqi WangDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Linheng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing, China.
Shun HeDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing 100021, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant proof suggests an essential role played by the bile microbiota in biliary diseases. This study retrospectively analyzed the differences in biliary microbes among patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), pancreatic cancer (PC), and cholelithiasis (CH). Bile samples were obtained from 53 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the bile microbiota was analyzed through 16S rRNA gene analysis and next-generation sequencing. Based on the results of linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), the top three biomarkers for pCCA at the genus level were Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, and Halomonas; for dCCA were Streptococcus, Prevotella, and Halomonas; and for PC were Pseudomonas, Chloroplast, and Acinetobacter. The top five genera in the pCCA, dCCA, and PC groups showed predictive values with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 91.56%, 95.56%, and 96.59%, respectively. The PICRUSt2 analysis outcomes displayed the diversities of fifteen pathways between the CH and pCCA groups, 22 pathways between the CH and dCCA groups, and eighteen pathways between the CH and PC groups. As this pilot study identified specific microbial bile markers for patients with CH, pCCA, dCCA, and PC, the clinical implications are vast. Further study focusing on distinct bacterial populations in bile will help differentiate biliary diseases.

Indexed as

Bile microbiotacholelithiasisdistal cholangiocarcinomapancreatic cancerperihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35702117
PMCPMC9185071
OpenAlexW4285741928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.