ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Arthroscopic-assisted reduction plus internal fixation and traditional open reduction plus internal fixation for talus fractures: a comparative study.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic-assisted management of talus and calcaneus fractures: A narrative review of the clinical outcomes and surgical technique.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the efficacy of arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) and traditional open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of talus fractures.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 92 patients with talus fractures admitted to our hospital. The patients were divided into a control group (treated with traditional open reduction and internal fixation) and a research group (with ARIF) with 46 cases in each. The operation indices, the score of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scoring System (AOFAS-AH), callus growth score, pain score, treatment effect, complications and quality of life score were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe research group showed shorter time of fracture healing, hospitalization and less intraoperative blood loss than the control group (all P<0.001). The ankle-hindfoot score in the research group was higher than those in the control group 3 and 6 months after surgery (both P<0.001). The excellent and good rate of treatment in the research group (93.48%) was higher than that in the control group (78.26%; P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the VAS score was lower and the callus growth score was higher in the research group at 1
conclusionARIF is more effective than traditional open reduction and internal fixation in treating talus fractures, with less complications and higher safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35702107PMC9185043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.