ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Clinical effect of trans-areolar resection and minimally invasive mammotome biopsy in the treatment of breast fibroadenoma and its impact on the quality of life of patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-inferiority of minimally invasive rotational cutting in granulomatous mastitis treatment: a comparative trial.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effects of trans-areolar resection and minimally invasive mammotome biopsy on therapeutic effect.
methodsA total of 131 patients with breast fibroadenoma were selected as the research subjects. Among them, 58 patients were treated by trans-areolar resection and included in group A (GA), and 73 patients were treated by minimally invasive mammotome biopsy and included in group B (GB). The changes of blood pressure, intraoperative blood loss and incision length in patients were detected before anesthesia, during resection and after operation. The pain score and operation time of patients were analyzed. The incidence of postoperative complications and the therapeutic effect were compared in the two groups. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to assess scar condition of patients in the two groups, and the lower the score, the more normal the skin. After operation, the satisfaction with breast appearance was assessed, and the quality of life was compared between the two groups.
resultsDuring resection, DBP and SBP indexes of blood pressure in GA were lower than GB . The intraoperative blood loss in GA was greater than GB, and the incision length was also greater than GB. The VAS pain score in GA was higher than GB (P<0.05), and operation time was also longer than GB. The incidence of complications in GB was significantly lower than GA. The total effective rate in GB was significantly higher than GA. The scar score in GA was significantly higher than GB. The satisfaction in GB was significantly higher than GA, and the quality of life in GB was higher than GA. All P<0.05.
conclusionCompared with trans-areolar resection, minimally invasive mammotome biopsy has a better therapeutic effect on patients with breast fibroadenoma, and it can improve their quality of life more significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35702095PMC9185088W4285744998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.