ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2022
Case-based, asynchronous sleep education outcomes among primary care nurse practitioner students.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Nurses' Needs Regarding Tailored, Evidence-Based Sleep Education and Training.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Physicians-in-training and advanced practice providers perceptions in managing perioperative obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-institutional survey.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring Nurse Practitioner Students' Perceptions of a Sleep e-Learning Program.Nursing education perspectivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesPrimary care nurse practitioners (NPs) receive little sleep education in graduate programs but are often first-line providers for patients presenting with sleep-related symptoms. A pre-/postevaluation study was conducted using asynchronous, case-based sleep education modules in a cohort of primary care NP students enrolled in a single academic institution's nursing master's degree program.
methodsSix virtual, case-based modules addressed adult sleep health and disorders, prioritized based on prevalence and primary care presentation. Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model guided outcome selection. Descriptive and paired comparative analyses were conducted.
resultsParticipants were first-year NP students (n = 149; 88% female; 82% ≤ 35 years of age) in an adult primary care program that included psychiatric/mental health track. Participants reacted positively to course delivery methods and content. Insomnia was endorsed by 87% as most relevant to practice with healthy sleep (88%) and obstructive sleep apnea (50%) also frequently endorsed as practice relevant. Posttest knowledge scores significantly improved for all modules (
conclusionsThis novel asynchronous, virtual curriculum met Kirkpatrick levels 1 and 2 (positive reaction and knowledge transfer) in NP students who predicted an impact on their practice (Kirkpatrick level 3). Studies are needed to assess the benefits of increasing primary care NP knowledge in sleep medicine on quality of care and access to care (Kirkpatrick level 4). Future use of this novel sleep curriculum in other professional curricula, new-to-sleep clinical researchers, and practicing primary care providers may further potentiate care quality and sleep care access. CITATION: Sawyer AM, Saconi B, Lyons MM, et al. Case-based, asynchronous sleep education outcomes among primary care nurse practitioner students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.