Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35702010›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2022

Sensitivity Analysis: A Method to Promote Certainty and Transparency in Nursing and Health Research.

Fabrice I Mowbray, Donna Manlongat, Meghna Shukla

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A review on the utility of sensitivity analysis in trauma research: Methods and challenges from recent trauma studies.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabrice I MowbrayDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8844-5850
Donna ManlongatCollege of Nursing, 2954Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Meghna ShuklaCollege of Nursing, 2954Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Wayne State University · USImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing and health researchers may be presented with uncertainty regarding the utilization or legitimacy of methodological or analytic decisions. Sensitivity analyses are purposed to gain insight and certainty about the validity of research findings reported. Reporting guidelines and health research methodologists have emphasized the importance of utilizing and reporting sensitivity analyses in clinical research. However, sensitivity analyses are underreported in nursing and health research. The aim of this methodological overview is to provide an introduction to the purpose, conduct, interpretation, and reporting of sensitivity analyses, using a series of simulated and contemporary case examples.

Indexed as

Research DesignResearch PersonnelHumansUncertaintynursing researchquantitative researchresearch methodssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID35702010
PMCPMC9605992
OpenAlexW4282924626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.