Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701791›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

A qualitative study of parental associations and beliefs regarding the HPV vaccination for Dutch boys.

Judith R Venderbos, Renske Eilers, Hein de Vries, Kim van Zoonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith R VenderbosFaculty of Health, Medicine and life Sciences, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Renske EilersCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Postbus 1, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Hein de VriesFaculty of Health, Medicine and life Sciences, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kim van ZoonenCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Postbus 1, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. kim.van.zoonen@rivm.nl.
Maastricht University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) occurs in 80% of the sexually active population and may cause certain types of cancers among men and women. Vaccination against HPV could prevent cancers associated with HPV. The Dutch National Immunization Program (NIP) only includes HPV vaccination for girls, but the HPV vaccination for boys will be implemented in 2022. Little is known about the awareness of parents and their attitudes regarding the vaccination for boys. However, these concepts might influence the intention to vaccinate one's child. Gaining insight in these factors could lead to more effective communication strategies.

methodsThis qualitative research aimed to explore parental associations and beliefs regarding the HPV vaccination for boys. In total, 16 interviews were conducted with parents. Topics discussed were primary associations with vaccinations, associations with HPV-vaccination and information needs regarding the HPV vaccination for boys.

resultsMost parents were unaware about HPV infections in boys as well as the possibility to vaccinate their sons. Furthermore, after hearing about the vaccine parents reported uncertainties about anticipated adverse effects of the vaccine. Other themes that emerged were difficulties with the proposed age at which boys would be offered the vaccination and low risk perception of the virus.

conclusionPublic campaigns regarding (the HPV) vaccination should improve (parental) awareness about the virus and the vaccination, and increase knowledge. Moreover, it should address concerns regarding vaccination and be transparent about decision making. For example, a rationale why HPV vaccination is needed for boys who turn 10 years and its advantage to reducing risks for boys to contract HPV related cancers should be provided.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesChildDecision MakingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePapillomaviridaeParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesBoysHPV vaccinationInformation needsNational immunization programParental beliefs

Identifiers

PMID35701791
PMCPMC9196852
OpenAlexW4282822078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.