Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701783›Full record

ReviewMolecular cytogenetics2022

Mechanisms of structural chromosomal rearrangement formation.

Bruna Burssed, Malú Zamariolli, Fernanda Teixeira Bellucco, Maria Isabel Melaragno

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cytogenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Ring chromosomes uncovered by optical genome mapping: impact of telomeric-associated regions and reference genome selection on structural variant interpretation.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Determinants of dicentric chromosome breakage inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. ALK Knock-In Reporter Reveals APE1 as a Negative Regulator ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transposon Ecology and the Octopus Genome.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Expression of EndonucleaseCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruna BurssedGenetics Division, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Malú ZamariolliGenetics Division, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fernanda Teixeira BelluccoGenetics Division, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Isabel MelaragnoGenetics Division, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. melaragno.maria@unifesp.br.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/21644-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural chromosomal rearrangements result from different mechanisms of formation, usually related to certain genomic architectural features that may lead to genetic instability. Most of these rearrangements arise from recombination, repair, or replication mechanisms that occur after a double-strand break or the stalling/breakage of a replication fork. Here, we review the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements, highlighting their main features and differences. The most important mechanisms of constitutional chromosomal alterations are discussed, including Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR), Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ), Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS), and Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication (MMBIR). Their involvement in chromoanagenesis and in the formation of complex chromosomal rearrangements, inverted duplications associated with terminal deletions, and ring chromosomes is also outlined. We reinforce the importance of high-resolution analysis to determine the DNA sequence at, and near, their breakpoints in order to infer the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements and to reveal how cells respond to DNA damage and repair broken ends.

Indexed as

ChromoanagenesisFork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS)Inv dup delMechanisms of formationMicrohomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR)Non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR)Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ)Ring chromosomeStructural chromosomal rearrangements

Identifiers

PMID35701783
PMCPMC9199198
OpenAlexW4282830797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.