Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701779›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Mental health of Covid-19 risk groups during the first Covid-19 lockdown in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Daniel Deimel, Thorsten Köhler, Janina Dyba, Niels Graf, Christine Firk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and Predictors of Somatization in Peruvian Undergraduate Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel DeimelGerman Institute for Addiction and Prevention Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 79-81, 50668, Cologne, Germany. d.deimel@katho-nrw.de.
Thorsten KöhlerGerman Institute for Addiction and Prevention Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 79-81, 50668, Cologne, Germany.
Janina DybaGerman Institute for Addiction and Prevention Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 79-81, 50668, Cologne, Germany.
Niels Graf *School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christine Firk *Department of Social Work, Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia, Robert-Schuman-Str. 25, 52066, Aachen, Germany.
Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine – Westphalia · DEBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing Covid-19 pandemic not only threatens physical health, but also affects the mental health of people. Yet, health consequences of the pandemic do not affect all members of society equally. We therefore assessed the mental health burden of individuals who are at increased risk of severe illness from Covid-19 compared to individuals who are at low risk of severe illness during the first lockdown (March, 2020) in Germany. Furthermore, we investigated variables mediating the effect of being an individual at increased risk of serve illness on depression.

methodsAdult German residents (n = 2.369) provided responses to a cross-sectional online survey about risk factors for of severe illness from Covid-19 and various aspects of mental health during the first lockdown in Germany. For data collection, standardized and validated self-report measures were used and for data analysis Mann-Whitney U-tests as well as regression and mediation analyses were performed.

resultsThe results clearly show that the mental health burden is higher among individuals at increased risk of severe illness from Covid-19 compared to individuals at low risk of severe illness from Covid-19. Moreover, our findings indicate that the association between Covid-19 risk status and depressive symptoms is mediated by concerns about mental health, anxiety and loneliness in a causal effect chain.

conclusionsIndividuals at increased risk of severe illness from Covid-19 have an increased need for psychosocial support during times of lockdown. Future public health policies should pay special attention to these individuals and support them by targeted offers. More research, however, is needed on possible long-term consequences of social distancing on mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionGermanyHumansMental HealthPandemicsRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Covid-19Covid-19 risk groupGermanyMental healthPandemic

Identifiers

PMID35701779
PMCPMC9196153
OpenAlexW4282835903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.