Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701760›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2022

Children's experiences of meals after obesity treatment: a qualitative follow-up four years after a randomized controlled trial.

Nicklas Neuman, Anna Jörnvi, Anna Ek, Karin Nordin, Karin Eli, Paulina Nowicka

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicklas NeumanDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Box 560, Husargatan 3, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden. nicklas.neuman@ikv.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-4753
Anna JörnviDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Box 560, Husargatan 3, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna EkDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Pediatrics, Karolinska Institutet, 141 57, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-8408
Karin NordinDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Pediatrics, Karolinska Institutet, 141 57, Huddinge, Sweden.
Karin EliDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Box 560, Husargatan 3, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9132-8404
Paulina NowickaDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Box 560, Husargatan 3, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9707-8768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practice of eating together, commensality, is rarely explored in the context of childhood obesity treatment. This is noteworthy given long-standing debates about the physical, psychosocial, and societal benefits of meals, especially family meals. Moreover, as children with obesity experience weight bias and stigma both within and outside the home, it is important to examine meals as a locus of social exchange around food and the body. Our study is based on the premises that eating together (i) matters and (ii) occurs in different environments with diverse social organization, where food-related interactions create varying arrangements of individuals, groups, their statuses, and their actions.

methodThe study explores children's experiences of meals in different social contexts. Thirty-two children (age 8-10 years) living in Sweden were interviewed, 4 years after they entered an obesity intervention trial. Thematic analysis was applied to the data.

resultsWe thematized three meal types, with each meal type having two subthemes: (i) "The family meal", with "Shared routines, rituals, and rules" and "Individual solutions and choices"; (ii) "The school meal", with "Rules and norms of the school" and "Strategies of the child"; and (iii) "The friend meal", with "Handling food that was disliked" and "Enjoyment of food". These three different meal types carried different experiences of and knowledge about how they were socially organized.

conclusionsWhile the children spoke about the family and school meals as meaningful, the friend meal stood out as particularly positive. Contrary to our expectations, the children did not express experiences of weight bias or obesity stigma around meals, nor did they speak negatively about parental control of their food intake. Our findings, especially regarding the friend meal, have implications for further research into commensality and social influences on eating among children with obesity, from early childhood into adolescence.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesityAdolescentChildChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolFeeding BehaviorFollow-Up StudiesHumansMealsParent-Child RelationsChildhood obesityCommensalityFamily mealsFood environmentSchool meals

Identifiers

PMID35701760
PMCPMC9199225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.