Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701676›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2022

WHO Participates in Effectiveness Research? A Comparison of Effectiveness Trial Clinicians to National Survey Samples.

Zabin S Patel, Dominique Philips, Elizabeth Casline, Gregory A Aarons, Colleen A Maxwell, Golda S Ginsburg, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Amanda Jensen-Doss

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. External and Internal Validity Considerations in Youth Effectiveness Trials: Lessons Learned from the COMET Study.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zabin S PatelDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA. zsp8@miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0250-0848
Dominique PhilipsDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA.
Elizabeth CaslineDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA.
Gregory A AaronsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Colleen A MaxwellDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Golda S GinsburgDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Jill Ehrenreich-MayDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA.
Amanda Jensen-DossDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA.

Funding

2/2-Unified Treatment of Adolescent Emotional Disorders in Community ClinicsR01MH106657 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI GINSBURG, GOLDA SUSAN · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
1/2-Unified Treatment of Adolescent Emotional Disorders in Community ClinicsR01MH106536 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI EHRENREICH-MAY, JILL, JENSEN-DOSS, AMANDA · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106536NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Findings from research participants in effectiveness treatment trials (i.e., randomized control trials conducted in community rather than research settings) are considered more generalizable than those from participants in efficacy trials. This is especially true for clinician participants, whose characteristics like attitudes towards evidence-based practices (EBPs) may impact treatment implementation and the generalizability of research findings from effectiveness studies. This study compared background characteristics, attitudes toward EBPs, and attitudes towards measurement-based care (MBC) among clinicians participating in a National Institute of Mental-Health (NIMH) funded effectiveness trial, the Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens (COMET), to clinician data from nationally representative U.S. survey samples. Results indicated COMET clinicians were significantly younger, less clinically experienced, and were more likely to have a training background in psychology versus other disciplines compared to national survey samples. After controlling for demographics and professional characteristics, COMET clinicians held more positive attitudes towards EBPs and MBC compared to national survey samples. Implications for implementation efforts are discussed.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeAdolescentHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeWorld Health OrganizationCommunity cliniciansEffectiveness trialsEvidence-based practiceImplementation scienceMeasurement-based care

Identifiers

PMID35701676
PMCPMC9393133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.