Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701675›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Comparison of robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy outcomes in multiple staple line treatment modalities from 2015 to 2019: a 5-year propensity score-adjusted MBSAQIP® analysis.

William C Bennett, Jihye Park, Murphy Mostellar, Ian C Garbarine, Manuel E Sanchez-Casalongue, Timothy M Farrell, Randal Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William C BennettDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. bennett.williamc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8666-5414
Jihye ParkDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
Murphy MostellarDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Ian C GarbarineDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Manuel E Sanchez-CasalongueDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Timothy M FarrellDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Randal ZhouDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is an increasingly common approach to sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is well-discussed in laparoscopic SG literature, but not RSG- likely due to the absence of dedicated robotic SLR devices. However, most RSG cases report SLR. This retrospective analysis compares outcomes in RSG cases reporting (1) any staple line treatment (SLT) vs none and (2) SLR vs oversewing.

methodsMBSAQIP was queried for adults who underwent RSG from 2015 to 2019. Open procedures, Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery, hand-assisted, single-incision, concurrent procedures, and illogical BMIs were excluded (n = 3444). Final sample included 52,354 patients. Two comparisons were made: SLT (n = 34,886) vs none (n = 17,468) and SLR (n = 22,217) vs oversew (n = 5620). We fitted multivariable regression models to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and performed propensity score analysis with inverse probability of treatment weight based on patient factors.

resultsMost RSG cases utilized SLT (66.6%). Cases with SLT had a reduced risk of organ space SSI (RR 0.68 [0.49, 0.94]), 30-day reoperation (RR 0.77 [0.64, 0.93]), 30-day re-intervention (RR 0.80 [0.67, 0.96]), sepsis (RR 0.58 [0.35, 0.96]), unplanned intubation (RR 0.59 [0.37, 0.93]), extended ventilator use (RR 0.46 [0.23, 0.91]), and renal failure (RR 0.40 [0.19, 0.82]) compared to no-treatment cases. In single-treatment cases (n = 27,837), most utilized SLR (79.8%). Cases with oversew had a higher risk of any SSI (RR 1.70 [1.19, 2.42]), superficial incisional SSI (RR 1.71 [1.06, 2.76]), septic shock (RR 6.47 [2.11, 19.87]), unplanned intubation (RR 2.18 [1.06, 4.47]), and extended ventilator use (> 48 h) (RR 4.55 [1.63, 12.71]) than SLR.

conclusionsOur data suggest SLT in RSG is associated with reduced risk of some adverse outcomes vs no-treatment. Among SLT, SLR demonstrated lower risk than oversewing. However, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest, and unplanned ICU admission were not significant.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultGastrectomyHumansPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSurgical StaplingTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryMBSAQIPOversewRobotic sleeve gastrectomyStaple line reinforcementStaple line treatment

Identifiers

PMID35701675
OpenAlexW4282928407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.