Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701640›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2022

Risk assessment in the patients with uterine cervical cancer harboring intermediate risk factors after radical hysterectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Shogo Shigeta, Muneaki Shimada, Keita Tsuji, Tomoyuki Nagai, Yasuhito Tanase, Koji Matsuo, Shoji Kamiura, Takashi Iwata, Harushige Yokota, Mikio Mikami

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shogo ShigetaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Muneaki ShimadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan. muneaki.shimada.b7@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6723
Keita TsujiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Tomoyuki NagaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Yasuhito TanaseDepartment of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Koji MatsuoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD520, Los Angeles, CA, 9033, USA.
Shoji KamiuraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Takashi IwataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8282, Japan.
Harushige YokotaDepartment of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780, Oazakomuro, Ina-machi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, Japan.
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, 143, Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

the JSPS KAKENHI JP17K11265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant therapy is usually considered for surgically treated patients with uterine cervical cancer harboring intermediate risk (IR) factors such as large tumor diameter, stromal invasion to the outer half, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). However, the indications and types of adjuvant therapy for the IR group remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the differences in patient outcomes in the IR group to provide novel insights for tailoring adjuvant therapy.

methodsData from 6192 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy at 116 institutions belonging to the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group were reviewed.

resultsIn total, 1688 patients were classified into the IR group, of whom 37.3% did not receive adjuvant therapy. Conversely, approximately equal proportions of the remaining patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Patients with all three risk factors showed worse overall survival than those with one or two risk factors. In addition to LVSI, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, and vaginal invasion were identified as independent risk factors for both recurrence and mortality in multivariate analyses. Tumor diameter greater than 40 mm and surgical center volume were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence. Stromal invasion to the outer half and ovarian metastasis were identified as independent risk factors for mortality.

conclusionsThis study revealed the significant differences in prognosis in the IR group. The indications for adjuvant therapy should be further studied, focusing on conventional risk factors and other pathological findings.

Indexed as

HysterectomyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansJapanRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAdjuvant therapyIntermediate riskRadical hysterectomyUterine cervical cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.