Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701569›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2022

Subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in south-Asian countries: a review of risk factors and etiology to prioritize control measures.

Md Saiful Bari, Md Mizanur Rahman, Ylva Persson, Marjolein Derks, Md Abu Sayeed, Delower Hossain, Shuvo Singha, Md Ahasanul Hoque, Subramnian Sivaraman, Palika Fernando and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exosomes in Mastitis-Research Status, Opportunities, and Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Md Saiful BariDepartment of Dairy and Poultry Science, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, Bangladesh. saifulbari@cvasu.ac.bd.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-6324
Md Mizanur RahmanUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3217-6866
Ylva PerssonUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6099-3759
Marjolein DerksUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
Md Abu SayeedUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-4178
Delower HossainUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-5353
Shuvo SinghaUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-1111
Md Ahasanul HoqueUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4407-1404
Subramnian SivaramanVeterinary Clinical Complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamilnadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Namakkal, India.
Palika FernandoDivision of Bacteriology, Veterinary Research Institute, Gannoruwa, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Ijaz AhmadDepartment of Livestock Managment, Breeding and Genetics, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawa, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Abdul SamadDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Bombay Veterinary College, Mumbai, India.
Gerrit KoopUdder Health Bangladesh, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-0193
Hamdard University Bangladesh · BDBangladesh University of Health Sciences · BDBombay Veterinary College · INSwedish Veterinary Agency · SETamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKUtrecht University · NLVeterinary Research Institute · LK

Funding

Swedish research council 2015-05897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis is a major production disease, causing significant economic losses for dairy farmers in South-Asian countries, as well as other parts of the world. Udder health control programs (UHCP) have been established in developed countries as an effective strategy for mastitis control but have not yet been introduced in South-Asian low-income countries like Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. To launch UHCP successfully in dairy herds in South-Asia, it is important to know the current prevalence and risk factors for subclinical mastitis (SCM). Therefore, a narrative literature review was conducted with the aim to describe the dairy sector, the prevalence of SCM and its causal agents, risk factors for mastitis occurrence and the control measures suggested by different studies conducted in the selected countries. The literature revealed that India had the highest cattle population. Milking was mainly done by hand in all of the studied countries. Stall feeding was done in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka and limited access to grazing was also reported in some farms in India and Pakistan. There was substantial variation in the prevalence of SCM between studies in all 4 countries, ranging from about 20% to about 80%, but the average prevalence across all studies was high (50%). The most common causal agents for SCM were non-aureus staphylococci (NAS), Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Escherichia (E.) coli. The management related risk factors reported for SCM were stall feeding of cows, a higher stock density, cracked floors, open drains, the presence of flies, poor drainage, peri-parturient diseases, infrequent dung removal and earth floors. The control measures suggested in these studies were to improve the hygiene and sanitation of cows, to improve the cleanliness of farms and milker's hands, to apply dry cow therapy, supplementing micronutrients and routine screening for SCM combined with taking intervention measures like isolation of cows or milking infected cows last, and proper treatment. Also, full hand milking, complete milking, machine milking, and providing feed and water immediately after milking have been recommended. Finally, we show that current literature often studies the same set of (non-manageable) risk factors, so more research is needed to obtain a comprehensive picture of the determinants of SCM. Randomized controlled trials are needed to truly quantify the effect of intervention under field conditions. Altogether, our work gives an overview of the udder health situation in South-Asia and provides the basis for the design of UHCP in this region.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMastitis, BovineStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsCattleDairyingEscherichia coliFemaleMilkPrevalenceRisk FactorsStaphylococcusStaphylococcus aureusCausal agentIncidenceIntramammary infectionPrevalenceUdder health

Identifiers

PMID35701569
OpenAlexW4282828979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.