Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701559›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2022

Transcranial Doppler for stratification of high-risk morphology of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Saori Chino, Yasuhide Mochizuki, Keita Mizuma, Saaya Ichikawa, Haruka Miyazaki, Rumi Hachiya, Eiji Toyosaki, Masashi Ota, Hiroto Fukuoka, Toshiko Yamochi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saori ChinoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhide MochizukiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan. y_mochizuki@med.showa-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-7012
Keita MizumaDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Saaya IchikawaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka MiyazakiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Rumi HachiyaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji ToyosakiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi OtaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroto FukuokaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiko YamochiDepartment of Pathology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro OnoDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiro ShinkeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Showa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbubble testing using transcranial Doppler (TCD) is an important screening tool for diagnosing paradoxical cerebral embolism with high-risk PFO. However, little is known about the association between the microbubble test by TCD and the features of high-risk PFO evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We studied 101 consecutive patients at Showa University, from April 2019 to October 2020, who underwent both TCD and TEE with a sufficient Valsalva maneuver and who were strongly suspected by neurologists as cryptogenic stroke. According to the appearance of microbubbles as high-intensity transient signals (HITS), the TCD grade was stratified into three categories based on the criteria (A: none, no HITS, B: small; 1-10 HITS, and C: large; > 10 HITS, or an uncountable number of HITS). Among patients with RLS through the PFO in TEE, high-risk morphological features of PFO for cerebral embolism were evaluated as follows: (1) tunnel height, (2) tunnel length, (3) total excursion distance of the atrial septum into the right and left atrium, (4) existence of Eustachian valve or Chiari network, (5) angle of PFO from the inferior vena cava, and (6) large shunt (20 or more microbubbles). Of 101 patients (TCD grade; Group A = 49, Group B = 26, Group C = 26), RLS through PFO was detected in 37 patients (grade A = 8, grade B = 6, grade C = 23) by TEE. Among PFO-positive patients, tunnel height, length, total excursion distance into the right and left atria, angle of PFO from the inferior vena cava, and frequency of large shunt in TEE were significantly larger in grade C than in grade A and B (p < 0.05). Additionally, grade C patients had significantly more forms of high-risk PFOs than those in grades A and B when the six features of high-risk PFO were compared. A multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the tunnel length of PFO and the presence of large shunt in TEE were independently associated with large HITS in TCD (odds ratio: 1.18 and 49.5, 95% confidence interval 1.043-1.337 and 10.05-244.3, p = 0.0086 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In conclusion, the existence of a large HITS detected by TCD may have a screening advantage in predicting the high-risk morphologies of PFO that can cause paradoxical cerebral embolism.

Indexed as

Foramen Ovale, PatentIntracranial EmbolismIschemic StrokeStrokeEchocardiography, TransesophagealHumansUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialCryptogenic strokeHigh-risk patent foramen ovaleTranscranial DopplerTransesophageal echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID35701559
OpenAlexW4282836856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.