ArticleHeart and vessels2022
Transcranial Doppler for stratification of high-risk morphology of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right-to-left shunt and transcranial Doppler as a diagnostic tool: when and how to run it. Position statement by the Italian society of neurosonology and cerebral haemodynamics.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Agitated saline with 10% blood increases number and stability of microbubbles in detection right-to-left shunt by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler: anJournal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbubble testing using transcranial Doppler (TCD) is an important screening tool for diagnosing paradoxical cerebral embolism with high-risk PFO. However, little is known about the association between the microbubble test by TCD and the features of high-risk PFO evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We studied 101 consecutive patients at Showa University, from April 2019 to October 2020, who underwent both TCD and TEE with a sufficient Valsalva maneuver and who were strongly suspected by neurologists as cryptogenic stroke. According to the appearance of microbubbles as high-intensity transient signals (HITS), the TCD grade was stratified into three categories based on the criteria (A: none, no HITS, B: small; 1-10 HITS, and C: large; > 10 HITS, or an uncountable number of HITS). Among patients with RLS through the PFO in TEE, high-risk morphological features of PFO for cerebral embolism were evaluated as follows: (1) tunnel height, (2) tunnel length, (3) total excursion distance of the atrial septum into the right and left atrium, (4) existence of Eustachian valve or Chiari network, (5) angle of PFO from the inferior vena cava, and (6) large shunt (20 or more microbubbles). Of 101 patients (TCD grade; Group A = 49, Group B = 26, Group C = 26), RLS through PFO was detected in 37 patients (grade A = 8, grade B = 6, grade C = 23) by TEE. Among PFO-positive patients, tunnel height, length, total excursion distance into the right and left atria, angle of PFO from the inferior vena cava, and frequency of large shunt in TEE were significantly larger in grade C than in grade A and B (p < 0.05). Additionally, grade C patients had significantly more forms of high-risk PFOs than those in grades A and B when the six features of high-risk PFO were compared. A multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the tunnel length of PFO and the presence of large shunt in TEE were independently associated with large HITS in TCD (odds ratio: 1.18 and 49.5, 95% confidence interval 1.043-1.337 and 10.05-244.3, p = 0.0086 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In conclusion, the existence of a large HITS detected by TCD may have a screening advantage in predicting the high-risk morphologies of PFO that can cause paradoxical cerebral embolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.