Quantifying the potential of morphological parameters for human dental identification: part 2-selecting the strongest identifiers in mandibular permanent teeth.

The current study aimed to select the best dental morphological identifiers for human identification. Sixty-two panoramic radiographs were collected retrospectively, in which six measurements were performed on all seven mandibular left permanent teeth: tooth length (TL), crown length (CL), root length (RL), crown width (CW), cervical width (CEJW), and root width (RW). Nine length-width ratios were then calculated using these measurements. Three groups of statistics were considered: (1) inter-observer reliability quantified by intra-class correlation (ICC); (2) mean "potential set"; and (3) Spearman correlation. A step-by-step cascade was then established based on selected parameters. In a univariate approach, the following parameters were the best identifiers: TL/CW for tooth 36 (ICC 0.82; mean potential set 13.7%), TL/CEJW for tooth 35 (ICC 0.87; mean potential set 15.2%), and TL/RW for tooth 32 (ICC 0.89; mean potential set 16.0%). The correlations between these three parameters ranged from 0.24 to 0.47. In a multivariate approach, the following parameters had the best identifying capacity: all parameters combined for tooth 31 (mean potential set 8.1%), for tooth 35 (mean potential set 11.9%), and for tooth 32 (mean potential set 16.3%). In conclusion, a single ratio in a specific tooth narrows down the potential set of matches, but the mean potential set remains relatively large. Combining all ratios of a single specific tooth increases the certainty of the match. In particular, tooth 31 was the strongest identifier.