Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Radiomics-based machine learning models to distinguish between metastatic and healthy bone using lesion-center-based geometric regions of interest.

Hossein Naseri, Sonia Skamene, Marwan Tolba, Mame Daro Faye, Paul Ramia, Julia Khriguian, Haley Patrick, Aixa X Andrade Hernandez, Marc David, John Kildea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hossein NaseriMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. hossein.naseri@mail.mcgill.ca.
Sonia SkameneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marwan TolbaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mame Daro FayeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Paul RamiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julia KhriguianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Haley PatrickMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Aixa X Andrade HernandezUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Marc DavidDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.
John KildeaMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CAThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics-based machine learning classifiers have shown potential for detecting bone metastases (BM) and for evaluating BM response to radiotherapy (RT). However, current radiomics models require large datasets of images with expert-segmented 3D regions of interest (ROIs). Full ROI segmentation is time consuming and oncologists often outline just RT treatment fields in clinical practice. This presents a challenge for real-world radiomics research. As such, a method that simplifies BM identification but does not compromise the power of radiomics is needed. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of radiomics models for BM detection using lesion-center-based geometric ROIs. The planning-CT images of 170 patients with non-metastatic lung cancer and 189 patients with spinal BM were used. The point locations of 631 BM and 674 healthy bone (HB) regions were identified by experts. ROIs with various geometric shapes were centered and automatically delineated on the identified locations, and 107 radiomics features were extracted. Various feature selection methods and machine learning classifiers were evaluated. Our point-based radiomics pipeline was successful in differentiating BM from HB. Lesion-center-based segmentation approach greatly simplifies the process of preparing images for use in radiomics studies and avoids the bottleneck of full ROI segmentation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoplasmsHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35701461
PMCPMC9198102
OpenAlexW4282913119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.