Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701457›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Monitoring and imaging pH in biofilms utilizing a fluorescent polymeric nanosensor.

Charlotte Kromer, Karin Schwibbert, Ashish K Gadicherla, Dorothea Thiele, Nithiya Nirmalananthan-Budau, Peter Laux, Ute Resch-Genger, Andreas Luch, Harald R Tschiche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte KromerDivision 75 "Product Materials and Nanotechnology", Department Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dorn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Karin SchwibbertDepartment Materials and the Environment, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, 12205, Berlin, Germany.
Ashish K GadicherlaDepartment Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 12277, Berlin, Germany.
Dorothea ThieleDepartment Materials and the Environment, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, 12205, Berlin, Germany.
Nithiya Nirmalananthan-BudauDivision 1.2 "Biophotonics", Department Analytical Chemistry, Reference Materials, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Richard-Willstaetter-Str. 11, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Peter LauxDivision 75 "Product Materials and Nanotechnology", Department Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dorn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Ute Resch-GengerDivision 1.2 "Biophotonics", Department Analytical Chemistry, Reference Materials, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Richard-Willstaetter-Str. 11, 12489, Berlin, Germany. ute.resch@bam.de.
Andreas LuchDivision 75 "Product Materials and Nanotechnology", Department Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dorn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Harald R TschicheDivision 75 "Product Materials and Nanotechnology", Department Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dorn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany. Harald.Tschiche@bfr.bund.de.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEFederal Institute For Materials Research and Testing · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are ubiquitous in nature and in the man-made environment. Given their harmful effects on human health, an in-depth understanding of biofilms and the monitoring of their formation and growth are important. Particularly relevant for many metabolic processes and survival strategies of biofilms is their extracellular pH. However, most conventional techniques are not suited for minimally invasive pH measurements of living biofilms. Here, a fluorescent nanosensor is presented for ratiometric measurements of pH in biofilms in the range of pH 4.5-9.5 using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The nanosensor consists of biocompatible polystyrene nanoparticles loaded with pH-inert dye Nile Red and is surface functionalized with a pH-responsive fluorescein dye. Its performance was validated by fluorometrically monitoring the time-dependent changes in pH in E. coli biofilms after glucose inoculation at 37 °C and 4 °C. This revealed a temperature-dependent decrease in pH over a 4-h period caused by the acidifying glucose metabolism of E. coli. These studies demonstrate the applicability of this nanosensor to characterize the chemical microenvironment in biofilms with fluorescence methods.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliFluorescent DyesBiofilmsFluoresceinHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPolymersFluoresceinFluorescent DyesPolymers

Identifiers

PMID35701457
PMCPMC9197968
OpenAlexW4282837654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.