Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701386›Full record

Observational studyEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2022

Pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture is feasible, safe and effective in the emergency department: A prospective observational comparative cohort study.

Alan Fahey, Elinor Cripps, Aloysius Ng, Amy Sweeny, Peter J Snelling

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05505604 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip Fracture Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsFemoral Neck Fractures, Intertrochanteric FracturesArmsPENG, FICB
NCT06531564 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Emergency Department Management of Isolated Femur Fracture Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2023 to 2024Enrolled155ConditionsFemur Fracture, Pain, Joint, Analgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alan FaheyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-8128
Elinor CrippsDepartment of Anaesthesia, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2552-6127
Aloysius NgDepartment of Acute Care Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8461-0601
Amy SweenyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-5612
Peter J SnellingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-445X
Griffith University · AUFiona Stanley Hospital · AUGold Coast Hospital · AULismore Base Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block was first described for analgesia of hip fracture in 2018. We hypothesised that the PENG block is safe and effective for patients with hip fracture when provided by emergency physicians and trainees in the ED.

methodsThis was an observational study of routine care. Consecutive patients receiving regional anaesthesia for hip fracture at a single ED were prospectively enrolled. Pain scores were assessed prior to regional anaesthesia then at 15, 30 and 60 min after administration. Maximal reduction in pain scores within 60 min were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (at rest and on movement) or the Pain Assessment IN Advanced Dementia tool (at rest). Patients were followed for opioid use for 12 h after regional anaesthesia and adverse events over the duration of admission.

resultsThere were 67 eligible patients during the enrolment period, with 52 (78%) prospectively enrolled. Thirty-three received femoral blocks (19 fascia iliaca compartment blocks, 14 femoral nerve blocks) and 19 received a PENG block. Inexperienced providers were able to successfully perform the PENG block. There was no difference in maximum pain score reduction between the groups. There was no difference in adverse effects between groups. Opioid use was similar between the groups. More patients were opioid-free after a PENG block.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrated that the PENG block can be provided safely and effectively to patients with hip fracture in the ED. On the basis of this pilot study, a larger randomised controlled study should now be designed.

Indexed as

Femoral NerveHip FracturesCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPainPilot Projectship fractureneck of femurPENG blockregional anaesthesiaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35701386
PMCPMC9796647
OpenAlexW4282935765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.