Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701374›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

A Decade of GigaScience: GigaDB and the Open Data Movement.

Chris Armit, Mary Ann Tuli, Christopher I Hunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chris ArmitGigaScience Press, BGI Hong Kong Tech Co Ltd., 26F A Kings Wing Place 2, 1 On Kwan Street, Shek Mun, Sha Tin, NT, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0002-9952-8141
Mary Ann TuliGigaScience Press, BGI Hong Kong Tech Co Ltd., 26F A Kings Wing Place 2, 1 On Kwan Street, Shek Mun, Sha Tin, NT, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0002-4667-9528
Christopher I HunterGigaScience Press, BGI Hong Kong Tech Co Ltd., 26F A Kings Wing Place 2, 1 On Kwan Street, Shek Mun, Sha Tin, NT, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-0881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasingly multidisciplinary nature of scientific research necessitates a need for Open Data repositories that can archive data in support of publications in scientific journals. Recognising this need, even before GigaScience launched in 2012, GigaDB was already in place and taking data for a year before (making it 11 this year). Since GigaDB launched, there has been a consistent growth in this resource in terms of data volume, data discoverability and data re-use. In this commentary, we provide a retrospective of key changes over the last decade, and the role of Data Curation in enhancing the user experience. Furthermore we explore a much needed emphasis on enabling researchers to interact with and explore datasets prior to data download.

Indexed as

Data CurationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35701374
PMCPMC9197680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.