Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701054›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Health literacy in context: struggling to self-manage diabetes - a longitudinal qualitative study.

Xavier Debussche, Maryvette Balcou-Debussche, Delphine Ballet, Jessica Caroupin-Soupoutevin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01425866 (Multicenter Randomized Trial of Structured Educational Intervention at the Community Level in Insufficiently Controlled Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Reunion Island), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01425866 nacompletednot on this map

Multicenter Randomized Trial of Structured Educational Intervention at the Community Level in Insufficiently Controlled Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Reunion Island

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionRan2011 to 2016Enrolled132ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsStructured self-management group education during 2 years
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xavier DebusscheCentre Expert Plaies Chroniques, Centre Hospitalier Max Querrien, Paimpol, France xavier.debussche@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-4297
Maryvette Balcou-DebusscheICARE EA7389 Austral Cooperative Institute for Research in Education, Reunion University, Saint-Denis, Réunion.
Delphine BalletICARE EA7389 Austral Cooperative Institute for Research in Education, Reunion University, Saint-Denis, Réunion.
Jessica Caroupin-SoupoutevinICARE EA7389 Austral Cooperative Institute for Research in Education, Reunion University, Saint-Denis, Réunion.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConsidering health literacy needs is a key component of health services responsiveness to diabetes self-management among vulnerable individuals. The purpose of this qualitative study was to provide a detailed analysis of the health literacy of people with type 2 diabetes in relation to their daily self-care practices.

designNested qualitative study in the ERMIES randomised controlled trial testing a 2-year structured care in type 2 diabetes. First round of semidirected interviews at the beginning of the trial with thematic analysis of content. Second round at the completion with directed interviews guided by the first round's themes together with Health Literacy Questionnaire. SETTINGS: Interviews conducted at home.

participantsForty-four (31 females/13 males, 30-79 years, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)≥7.5%) consecutive participants out of 100 recruited in the ERMIES trial from 4 diabetology outpatient settings (Reunion Island). Forty-two respondents to the second round interviews.

resultsThree poles structured into eight themes characterised practices in context: health knowledge, disease management, expertise and social support. The relationships of participants in each of the eight themes were differentiated, ranging from functional to interactive and critical. Treatment and follow-up were essentially functional, while diet and exercise remained more interactive. Social support and relationship to health professionals were important determinants of disease management.

conclusionsTreatment management and disease monitoring remain primarily the job of health professionals, as opposed to diet, physical activity and social support being part of ordinary practice. Decision-making, as a shared social task, as well as resources for participation in health services, should be considered for relevant interventions in type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01425866.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health LiteracySelf-ManagementFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleQualitative ResearchGlycated HemoglobinDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID35701054
PMCPMC9198688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.