Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35701045›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Qualitative analysis of the organisational response of a university hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis.

Hakim Harkouk, Patrick Castel, Lucile Hervouët, Dominique Fletcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hakim HarkoukService d'anesthésie, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Patrick CastelCentre de Sociologie des organisations, CNRS, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Lucile HervouëtCentre de Sociologie des organisations, Sciences Po, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Dominique FletcherService d'anesthésie, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Boulogne Billancourt, France dominique.fletcher@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6157-1331
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has required urgent organisational and managerial adaptation, with hospital medical and administrative leaders under considerable pressure.

methodsAt a single French university hospital, we performed a sociological analysis of management adaptation by medical and administrative leaders during the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis. Two sociologists performed interviews with representative members of staff from all the structures involved in managing the crisis to analyse adaptation and the solutions found during this period.

resultsThe answers collected during interviews were classified into three main topics describing the organisational adaptations of the hospital staff during the COVID-19 crisis: (1) exceptional mobilisation and collaboration; (2) crisis management based primarily on the principle of subsidiarity; and (3) survival of the administrative structure with interventions to support caregivers.

conclusionThis study, focusing on a single hospital, identified a number of factors associated with successful mobilisation in the very specific conditions of this viral pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hospitals, UniversityHumansPandemicsPersonnel, HospitalCrisis managementLeadershipManagement

Identifiers

PMID35701045
PMCPMC9198384
OpenAlexW4282843187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.