Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35700524›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Economic analysis of biosecurity adoption in dairy farming: evidence from Ireland.

Osayanmon W Osawe, Doris Läpple, John F Mee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Osayanmon W OsaweEconomic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland, D02 K138.ORCID 0000-0003-1122-0757
Doris LäppleDepartment of Economics, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland, H91 TK33.ORCID 0000-0003-4935-5403
John F MeeTeagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland, P61 C996.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the significant negative impact of livestock disease outbreaks on animal and public health, preventing disease spread through biosecurity practices is important. In this study, we used a nationally representative dataset that included information on biosecurity practices of almost 300 Irish dairy farmers. We applied parametric and nonparametric estimation methods to assess the economic implications of adopting the following biosecurity measures: vaccination, bulk tank milk testing for diseases, and not pooling colostrum. We found mixed evidence of biosecurity practices on economic outcomes, measured as gross margins per cow. Specifically, we found that vaccination and testing bulk tank milk for diseases were significantly associated with better economic outcomes for dairy farms. However, we found no significant association with the economic performance of not pooling colostrum from more than one animal. Our findings have important policy implications required for targeting support for the adoption of biosecurity practices in dairy herds.

Indexed as

BiosecurityDairyingAnimalsCattleFarmersFarmsFemaleHumansIrelandbiomanagementbiosecuritydairy farmingfarm economic performance

Identifiers

PMID35700524
PMCPMC9492279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.