Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35700310›Full record

ReviewProteomics2022

Site-specific glycosylation of SARS-CoV-2: Big challenges in mass spectrometry analysis.

Diana Campos, Michael Girgis, Miloslav Sanda

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Variations inBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana CamposMax-Planck-Institut fuer Herz- und Lungenforschung, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Michael GirgisDepartment of Bioengineering, Volgenau School of Engineering and Computing, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Miloslav SandaMax-Planck-Institut fuer Herz- und Lungenforschung, Bad Nauheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-3635
George Mason University · USGeorgetown University · USMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosylation of viral proteins is required for the progeny formation and infectivity of virtually all viruses. It is increasingly clear that distinct glycans also play pivotal roles in the virus's ability to shield and evade the host's immune system. Recently, there has been a great advancement in structural identification and quantitation of viral glycosylation, especially spike proteins. Given the ongoing pandemic and the high demand for structure analysis of SARS-CoV-2 densely glycosylated spike protein, mass spectrometry methodologies have been employed to accurately determine glycosylation patterns. There are still many challenges in the determination of site-specific glycosylation of SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein. This is compounded by some conflicting results regarding glycan site occupancy and glycan structural characterization. These are probably due to differences in the expression systems, form of expressed spike glycoprotein, MS methodologies, and analysis software. In this review, we recap the glycosylation of spike protein and compare among various studies. Also, we describe the most recent advancements in glycosylation analysis in greater detail and we explain some misinterpretation of previously observed data in recent publications. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the spike protein glycosylation and highlights the importance of consistent glycosylation determination.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2GlycosylationHumansMass SpectrometryPolysaccharidesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusPolysaccharidesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2glycoproteomicsN-glycosylationO-glycosylationSARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein

Identifiers

PMID35700310
PMCPMC9349404
OpenAlexW4282928899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.