Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35700195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Gardnerella vaginalis clades in pregnancy: New insights into the interactions with the vaginal microbiome.

Marco Severgnini, Sara Morselli, Tania Camboni, Camilla Ceccarani, Melissa Salvo, Sara Zagonari, Giulia Patuelli, Maria Federica Pedna, Vittorio Sambri, Claudio Foschi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco SevergniniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Sara MorselliMicrobiology, DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Tania CamboniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Camilla CeccaraniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Melissa SalvoMicrobiology, DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara ZagonariFamily Advisory Health Centres, Ravenna, Italy.
Giulia PatuelliFamily Advisory Health Centres, Ravenna, Italy.
Maria Federica PednaUnit of Microbiology, Greater Romagna Hub Laboratory, Pievesestina di Cesena, Italy.
Vittorio SambriMicrobiology, DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio FoschiMicrobiology, DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-8799
Clarissa ConsolandiInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Segrate, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-9557
Antonella MarangoniMicrobiology, DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Institute of Biomedical Technologies · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gardnerella vaginalis (GV) is an anaerobic bacterial species involved in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis (BV), a condition of vaginal dysbiosis associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. GV strains are categorized into four clades, characterized by a different ability to produce virulence factors, such as sialidase. We investigated the distribution of GV clades and sialidase genes in the vaginal ecosystem of a cohort of pregnant women, assessing the correlations between GV clades and the whole vaginal microbiome. A total of 61 Caucasian pregnant women were enrolled. Their vaginal swabs, collected both at the first and third trimester of pregnancy, were used for (i) evaluation of the vaginal status by Nugent score, (ii) vaginal microbiome profiling by 16S rRNA sequencing, (iii) detection and quantification of GV clades and sialidase A gene by qPCR assays. DNA of at least one GV clade was detected in most vaginal swabs, with clade 4 being the most common one. GV clade 2, together with the presence of multiple clades (>2 simultaneously), were significantly associated with a BV condition. Significantly higher GV loads and sialidase gene levels were found in BV cases, compared to the healthy status. Clade 2 was related to the major shifts in the vaginal microbial composition, with a decrease in Lactobacillus and an increase in several BV-related taxa. As the number of GV clades detected simultaneously increased, a group of BV-associated bacteria tended to increase as well, while Bifidobacterium tended to decrease. A negative correlation between sialidase gene levels and Lactobacillus, and a positive correlation with Gardnerella, Atopobium, Prevotella, Megasphaera, and Sneathia were observed. Our results added knowledge about the interactions of GV clades with the inhabitants of the vaginal microbiome, possibly helping to predict the severity of BV and opening new perspectives for the prevention of pregnancy-related complications.

Indexed as

Gardnerella vaginalisGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMicrobiotaPregnancy Complications, InfectiousVaginosis, BacterialFemaleHumansLactobacillusNeuraminidasePregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVaginaNeuraminidaseRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35700195
PMCPMC9197028
OpenAlexW4282923437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.